While this change is not 100% required now, it's good habit
and we are checking for it since Moodle 4.4.
All the changes in this commit have been applied automatically
using the moodle.PHPUnit.TestReturnType sniff and are, exclusively
adding the ": void" return types when missing.
To be integrated as part of MDL-81266
When running PHPUnit 9.6 we get the following deprecation warnings:
"assertObjectHasAttribute() is deprecated and will be removed in PHPUnit
10. Refactor your test to use assertObjectHasProperty() instead."
So we replace all instances of assertObjectHasAttribute with
assertObjectHasProperty.
PHPUnit justifies the change with:
> PHPUnit currently refers to "fields" (see above) as "attributes". This
> is (or will become) confusing considering the introduction of
> attributes in PHP 8 and their support in PHPUnit. PHPUnit will be
> changed to use the term "property" instead of "attribute" where "field"
> is meant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ziegenberg <daniel@ziegenberg.at>
To be integrated as part of MDL-81266
When running PHPUnit 9.6 we get the following deprecation warnings:
"assertObjectNotHasAttribute() is deprecated and will be removed in PHPUnit
10. Refactor your test to use assertObjectNotHasProperty() instead."
So we replace all instances of assertObjectNotHasAttribute with
assertObjectNotHasProperty.
PHPUnit justifies the change with:
> PHPUnit currently refers to "fields" (see above) as "attributes". This
> is (or will become) confusing considering the introduction of
> attributes in PHP 8 and their support in PHPUnit. PHPUnit will be
> changed to use the term "property" instead of "attribute" where "field"
> is meant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ziegenberg <daniel@ziegenberg.at>
This has been generated running the following Sniffs, all
them part of the Moodle's CodeSniffer standard:
- PSR12.Functions.ReturnTypeDeclaration
- PSR12.Functions.NullableTypeDeclaration
- moodle.Methods.MethodDeclarationSpacing
- Squiz.Whitespace.ScopeKeywordSpacing
All them are, exclusively, about correct spacing, so the changes
are, all them, only white space changes.
Only exceptions to the above are 3 changes what were setting the
return type in a new line, and, when that happens, the closing
parenthesis (bracket) has to go to the same line than the colon.
These are the only cases 100% safe to apply the renaming of the
testcase class names to match the file names.
All other cases are not safe, because they are missing namespace
and may enter into name conflicts. Adding namespaces is not as
simple as imagined because it implies to, also, add a good number
of modifications to core. See the issue for more details.
Andrew Nicols