Fixed some typos.

This commit is contained in:
gustav_delius
2005-02-13 18:46:08 +00:00
parent b56ccdd9d0
commit 1d7bda4583
60 changed files with 1209 additions and 1403 deletions
+18 -18
View File
@@ -1,33 +1,33 @@
<p align="center"><b>Administration Page</b></p>
<p>This page allows the teacher to see the one or more descriptions for the
<p>This page allows the teacher to see the one or more descriptions for the
Exercise, the student assessments and the student submissions. These items
can be retitled, viewed or deleted by using the various links on the page.
The page also shows which piece of works have been submitted after the
The page also shows which piece of works have been submitted after the
deadline, that is those submitted late.</p>
<p>The first table on this screen shows the teacher's submission(s). Normally
there is only one. This is the decsription of the exercise, it will
there is only one. This is the description of the exercise, it will
normally contain instructions on what work should be done. If the teacher
has submitted more then one description they are listed here. Note that
once the Exercise is underway these submissions should <b>NOT</b> be
has submitted more then one description they are listed here. Note that
once the Exercise is underway these submissions should <b>NOT</b> be
deleted. It is, however, safe to delete the teacher submissions while the
Exercise is still in the Set Up phase.</p>
<p>The second table shows the student's (initial) assessment of their own work.
It shows the grade the student has given their work. If the teacher has
assessed the work, this table will also contain the &quot;grading
grade&quot; awarded to his assessment. This grade reflects how well the
student's assessment agrees with the teacher's assessment. The student's
assessment can be viewed. There is link on that page to change the grading
<p>The second table shows the student's (initial) assessment of their own work.
It shows the grade the student has given their work. If the teacher has
assessed the work, this table will also contain the &quot;grading
grade&quot; awarded to his assessment. This grade reflects how well the
student's assessment agrees with the teacher's assessment. The student's
assessment can be viewed. There is link on that page to change the grading
grade should the teacher wish to do so.</p>
<p>The third table lists the submissions and their grades if the teacher has
assessed them. Submissions can be regraded or safely deleted. An asterix
(*) against a submission means that the student is allow to submit another
piece of work. For a particular student, this option can be easily changed
by simply re-assessing their submission and clicking on the appropriate
button at the foot of the assessment page, the assessment itself need not
be changed. Late work is shown with the date submitted in red. The late
<p>The third table lists the submissions and their grades if the teacher has
assessed them. Submissions can be regraded or safely deleted. An asterisk
(*) against a submission means that the student is allow to submit another
piece of work. For a particular student, this option can be easily changed
by simply re-assessing their submission and clicking on the appropriate
button at the foot of the assessment page, the assessment itself need not
be changed. Late work is shown with the date submitted in red. The late
flag can be cleared by clicking on the link.</p>
@@ -1,68 +1,68 @@
<p align="center"><b>Comparison of Assessments</b></p>
<p>In an exercise it is usual for a piece of work to be assessed twice. A
student assesses their work before submitting it and the teacher then
(re)assesses the work. The teacher's assessment uses the student's
<p>In an exercise it is usual for a piece of work to be assessed twice. A
student assesses their work before submitting it and the teacher then
(re)assesses the work. The teacher's assessment uses the student's
assessment as the starting point. An exercise allows the teacher to award
a proportion of the grade to the student's assessment, the remainder of
the grade is allocated to the teacher's assessment of the work. (The
maximum grades for these are called &quot;Grade for Student
a proportion of the grade to the student's assessment, the remainder of
the grade is allocated to the teacher's assessment of the work. (The
maximum grades for these are called &quot;Grade for Student
Assessments&quot; and &quot;Grade for Submissions&quot; respectively.) Note
that the grade from the student's assessment is not used. The student's
assessment is given a grade based on how well it matches the teacher's
that the grade from the student's assessment is not used. The student's
assessment is given a grade based on how well it matches the teacher's
assessment.</p>
<p>The degree of agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment is
based on the differences between the scores in individual elements
<p>The degree of agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment is
based on the differences between the scores in individual elements
(actually the squared differences are used). The mean of these differences
must to converted into a meaningful grade. The &quot;Comparison of
Assessments&quot; option allows the teacher a degree of control on how
must to converted into a meaningful grade. The &quot;Comparison of
Assessments&quot; option allows the teacher a degree of control on how
these comparisons are converted into grades.</p>
<p>To get some idea on what effect this option has, take the (fairly simple)
case of an assessment which has ten Yes/No questions. For example the
assessment might use questions like "Is the chart correctly formatted?",
"Is the calculated profit $100.66?", etc. Assume there are ten such
questions. When the &quot;Very Lax&quot; setting is chosen, prefect
<p>To get some idea on what effect this option has, take the (fairly simple)
case of an assessment which has ten Yes/No questions. For example the
assessment might use questions like "Is the chart correctly formatted?",
"Is the calculated profit $100.66?", etc. Assume there are ten such
questions. When the &quot;Very Lax&quot; setting is chosen, prefect
agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment gives a grade of
100%, if there is only one question which does not match the grade is 90%,
two disagreements give a grade of 80%, three
disagreements 70%, etc.. That might seem very reasonable and you might be thinking
why is this option called a &quot;Very Lax&quot; comparison. Well, consider
the case of a student doing a completely random assessment where the
answers of the ten questions are simply
guessed. On average this would result in five of the ten questions being
100%, if there is only one question which does not match the grade is 90%,
two disagreements give a grade of 80%, three
disagreements 70%, etc.. That might seem very reasonable and you might be thinking
why is this option called a &quot;Very Lax&quot; comparison. Well, consider
the case of a student doing a completely random assessment where the
answers of the ten questions are simply
guessed. On average this would result in five of the ten questions being
matched. So the &quot;monkey's&quot; assessment would get a grade of around
50%. The situation gets a little more sensible with the &quot;Lax&quot;
option, then
the random assessment gets around 20%. When the &quot;Fair&quot; option is
chosen, random guessing will result in a zero grade most of the
time. At this level, a grade of 50% is given when the two assessments agree
on eight questions of the ten. If three questions are in disagreement then
the grade given is 25%. When the option is set to &quot;Strict&quot; having
two questions out of sync gives a grade of 40%. Moving into the &quot;Very
Strict&quot; territory a disagreement in just two questions drops the grade to
50%. The situation gets a little more sensible with the &quot;Lax&quot;
option, then
the random assessment gets around 20%. When the &quot;Fair&quot; option is
chosen, random guessing will result in a zero grade most of the
time. At this level, a grade of 50% is given when the two assessments agree
on eight questions of the ten. If three questions are in disagreement then
the grade given is 25%. When the option is set to &quot;Strict&quot; having
two questions out of sync gives a grade of 40%. Moving into the &quot;Very
Strict&quot; territory a disagreement in just two questions drops the grade to
35% and having a single question in disagreement gives a grade of 65%.</p>
<p>This example is sightly artifical as most assessments usually have elements
which have a range of values rather than just Yes or No. In those cases the
<p>This example is sightly artificial as most assessments usually have elements
which have a range of values rather than just Yes or No. In those cases the
comparison is likely to result in somewhat higher grades then the values
indicated above. The various levels (Very Lax, Lax, Fair...) are given so
indicated above. The various levels (Very Lax, Lax, Fair...) are given so
that the teacher can fine tune the comparisons. If they feel that the grades
being given for assessments are too low then this option should be moved
towards the &quot;Lax&quot; or even &quot;Very Lax&quot; choices. And
alternatively, if the grades for the student's assessments are, in general,
felt to be too high this option should be moved to either the
&quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; choices. It is really a
matter of trial and error with the best starting point being the
being given for assessments are too low then this option should be moved
towards the &quot;Lax&quot; or even &quot;Very Lax&quot; choices. And
alternatively, if the grades for the student's assessments are, in general,
felt to be too high this option should be moved to either the
&quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; choices. It is really a
matter of trial and error with the best starting point being the
&quot;Fair&quot; option.</p>
<p>During the course of the exercise the teacher may feel that the grades given
to the student assessments are either too high or too low. These grades are
shown on the exercise's Administration Page. In this case, the teacher can
change the setting of this option and re-calculate the student assessment
grades (the &quot;Grading Grades&quot;). The re-calculation is done by
grades (the &quot;Grading Grades&quot;). The re-calculation is done by
clicking the &quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link found on the
administration page of the exercise. This can be safely performed at any
administration page of the exercise. This can be safely performed at any
time in the exercise.</p>
+43 -43
View File
@@ -1,71 +1,71 @@
<p align="center"><b>Assessment Elements</b></p>
<p>For ease of grading, a Exercise Assessment should have a reasonable
number of &quot;Assessment Elements&quot;. Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assessment. Typically an assessment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </p>
<p>For ease of grading, a Exercise Assessment should have a reasonable
number of &quot;Assessment Elements&quot;. Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assessment. Typically an assessment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </p>
<p>The type of elements dependent on the assignment's grading strategy.</p>
<p><b>Not Graded.</b> The elements are descriptions of aspects of the assignment.
The assessor is asked to comment on each of these aspects. As with all the grading
strategies, there is also an area for general comments.</p>
<p><b>Not Graded.</b> The elements are descriptions of aspects of the assignment.
The assessor is asked to comment on each of these aspects. As with all the grading
strategies, there is also an area for general comments.</p>
<p><b>Accumulative Grading.</b> The elements have the following three features:</p>
<ol>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualatative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li><p>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of prefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be choosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</p>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualitative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<p>If custom scales are set up in the course, these can be used. Note,
<li><p>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of predefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be chosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</p>
<p>If custom scales are set up in the course, these can be used. Note,
however, that this type of scale is used as a multi-point scale and that
only the first and last items of the scale are shown. For example, if the
only the first and last items of the scale are shown. For example, if the
custom scale &quot;Very Wet, Wet, Damp, Dry&quot; is created in the course,
this can be used and it will be shown as a four point scale labeled
&quot;Very Wet&quot; at one end of the scale and &quot;Dry&quot; at the
this can be used and it will be shown as a four point scale labeled
&quot;Very Wet&quot; at one end of the scale and &quot;Dry&quot; at the
other.</p></li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. Weights can
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. Weights can
be assigned negative values, this is an experimental feature.</li>
</ol>
<p><b>Error Banded Grading.</b> The elements will normally describe certain items
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on
<p><b>Error Banded Grading.</b> The elements will normally describe certain items
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on
the present or absence of these items or aspects. The teacher must all set of
grade table which give the suggested grades when all the items are present,
when one is absent, when two are absent, etc. If certain items are more
grade table which give the suggested grades when all the items are present,
when one is absent, when two are absent, etc. If certain items are more
important than others then those items can be given a weighting greater than
one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The overall
&quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
can always make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</p>
one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The overall
&quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
can always make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</p>
<p><b>Criterion Grading.</b> The elements will give a set of &quot;level&quot;
<p><b>Criterion Grading.</b> The elements will give a set of &quot;level&quot;
statements which can be used to rank the assignment. The statements may be
cumulative or they may each be self contained. The assessor must decide which
statement best fits each piece of work. The teacher must also relate each
statement best fits each piece of work. The teacher must also relate each
criterion statement with a suggested grade. These should normally be in order.
The assessor can make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</p>
<p><b>Rubric Grading.</b> This is similar to Criterion Grading but there is more
than one criteria. The number of criteria is given in the assignment
parameters. Within each criterion there can be up to five &quot;level&quot;
than one criteria. The number of criteria is given in the assignment
parameters. Within each criterion there can be up to five &quot;level&quot;
statements. In a given assignment the number of levels can vary from criterion
to criterion. When setting up a criterion a blank level statement signals the
end of the level statements. Thus some criteria may have two levels, others
have three, up to five levels. The criteria can be weighted. The levels are
scored 0, 1, 2, up to 4. The grade for the assessment is a weighted sum of
end of the level statements. Thus some criteria may have two levels, others
have three, up to five levels. The criteria can be weighted. The levels are
scored 0, 1, 2, up to 4. The grade for the assessment is a weighted sum of
these scores.
</p>
+6 -6
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Final Grades</b></p>
<p>The table on this screen lists the overall grades and their breakdown. The first grade is
the grade for the (inital) assessment. This is added to the grades given to each
submission. The final grade given for this assignment will either be
the average of these overall grades or the overall grade of the best submission.</p>
the grade for the (initial) assessment. This is added to the grades given to each
submission. The final grade given for this assignment will either be
the average of these overall grades or the overall grade of the best submission.</p>
<p>The League table optionally lists the best submissions. The number of entries in
the table is set as one of the Exercise parameters. If that number is set to zero then
the League Table is not displayed. The table is in grade order with the best submission
<p>The League table optionally lists the best submissions. The number of entries in
the table is set as one of the Exercise parameters. If that number is set to zero then
the League Table is not displayed. The table is in grade order with the best submission
first. Only a student's best submission is shown in the table.</p>
+34 -34
View File
@@ -1,46 +1,46 @@
<p align="center"><b>Grading of Assignments</b></p>
<p>In this Exercise the same Assessment Form is used by Students and Teachers
to assess the work produced. The form is used at different stages of the
exercise by the two groups, thus the explaination given here is divided into
two parts.</p>
to assess the work produced. The form is used at different stages of the
exercise by the two groups, thus the explanation given here is divided into
two parts.</p>
<p><b>For Students</b></p>
<p>The assessment form is used mainly to show you how your work will be
assessed by the teacher. You are required to complete this form <b>before</b>
you can submit your work. You can use it as a checklist. The form is <b>not</b>
sent to the teacher when you save it. You can return to this form and amend it
(and your piece of work) as many times as you like provided you have
<b>not</b> submitted the work. Note that although you are allowed to, there
is no need to submit your work immediately after you have completely this form.
However, the contents of your assessment are frozen and made available to the
teacher when you submit your work.</p>
<p>If the teacher requests that you make changes to your work and to re-submit
it, you will <b>not</b> be asked to re-assess your &quot;new&quot; piece of
work. You only make this assessment &quot;first time round&quot;.</p>
<p>This (initial) assessment of your work is compared to the teacher's
<p>The assessment form is used mainly to show you how your work will be
assessed by the teacher. You are required to complete this form <b>before</b>
you can submit your work. You can use it as a checklist. The form is <b>not</b>
sent to the teacher when you save it. You can return to this form and amend it
(and your piece of work) as many times as you like provided you have
<b>not</b> submitted the work. Note that although you are allowed to, there
is no need to submit your work immediately after you have completely this form.
However, the contents of your assessment are frozen and made available to the
teacher when you submit your work.</p>
<p>If the teacher requests that you make changes to your work and to re-submit
it, you will <b>not</b> be asked to re-assess your &quot;new&quot; piece of
work. You only make this assessment &quot;first time round&quot;.</p>
<p>This (initial) assessment of your work is compared to the teacher's
assessment of your work. The closer the two assessments match the higher
will be your &quot;grading grade&quot;. This grade is usually a smaller
will be your &quot;grading grade&quot;. This grade is usually a smaller
grade than the grade you are given for your work. The final grade for the
exercise is these two grades added together.</p>
<p>Once you have submitted your own work the teacher will grade it using the
same assessment form. You will be able to see their scores for your work
and their comments. Their grade will normally form the main part of the
<p>Once you have submitted your own work the teacher will grade it using the
same assessment form. You will be able to see their scores for your work
and their comments. Their grade will normally form the main part of the
final grade you receive from this Exercise.</p>
<p><b>For the Teacher</b></p>
<p>The assessment form is used to grade the submissions of the students.
These grades normally form the major component of the students' final grade
for the exercise. The assessment, it's grade and any comments you make can
be viewed by the student who submitted the work. Once you have made the
assessment you should decide whether to allow the student to change and
re-submit their work, hopefully with improvements, or not.</p>
<p>When you save an assessment you given a short period of time in which to
make any amendments before the assessment to &quot;released&quot; to
the student.</p>
<p>The assessment form is used to grade the submissions of the students.
These grades normally form the major component of the students' final grade
for the exercise. The assessment, it's grade and any comments you make can
be viewed by the student who submitted the work. Once you have made the
assessment you should decide whether to allow the student to change and
re-submit their work, hopefully with improvements, or not.</p>
<p>When you save an assessment you given a short period of time in which to
make any amendments before the assessment to &quot;released&quot; to
the student.</p>
+68 -68
View File
@@ -3,83 +3,83 @@
<p>An Exercise assignment is quite flexible in the type of grading scheme used. This can be:</p>
<ol>
<li><b>No grading:</b> In this type of assignment the teacher is not
interested in quantative assessment from the students at all. The students
make comments of the pieces of works but do not grade them. The teacher,
however, can, if desired, grade the student comments. These
&quot;grading grades&quot; form the basis of the students' final grades.
If the teacher does not grade the student assessments then the assignment
does not have any final grades.</li>
<li><b>No grading:</b> In this type of assignment the teacher is not
interested in quantitative assessment from the students at all. The students
make comments of the pieces of works but do not grade them. The teacher,
however, can, if desired, grade the student comments. These
&quot;grading grades&quot; form the basis of the students' final grades.
If the teacher does not grade the student assessments then the assignment
does not have any final grades.</li>
<li><b>Accumulative grading:</b> This is the default type of grading.
In this type of assignment the grade of each
assessment is made up of a number of &quot;assessment elements&quot;.
Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. An
exercise assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </li>
In this type of assignment the grade of each
assessment is made up of a number of &quot;assessment elements&quot;.
Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. An
exercise assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </li>
<p>Elements have the following three features:</p>
<ol>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualatative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li><p>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of prefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be choosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</p>
<p>If custom scales are set up in the course, these can be used. Note,
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualitative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li><p>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of predefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be chosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</p>
<p>If custom scales are set up in the course, these can be used. Note,
however, that this type of scale is used as a multi-point scale and that
only the first and last items of the scale are shown. For example, if the
only the first and last items of the scale are shown. For example, if the
custom scale &quot;Very Wet, Wet, Damp, Dry&quot; is created in the course,
this can be used and it will be shown as a four point scale labeled
&quot;Very Wet&quot; at one end of the scale and &quot;Dry&quot; at the
this can be used and it will be shown as a four point scale labeled
&quot;Very Wet&quot; at one end of the scale and &quot;Dry&quot; at the
other.</p></li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
</ol>
<br />
<li><b>Error Banded Grading:</b> In this type of assignment the submissions are
graded on a set of Yes/No scales. The grade is determined by the &quot;Grade
Table &quot; which gives the relationship between the number of
&quot;errors&quot; and the suggested grade. For example an assignment may have six
significant items which should be present, the Grade Table will give suggested
grades if all are present, one is absent, if two are absent, etc. The individual
items can, if desired, be given weighting factors if some items are more important
than others. The number of &quot;errors&quot; is a weighted sum of the items not
present. By default each item is given a weight of one. The grading table is likely
to be non-linear, for example
the sugested grades may be 90%, 70%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, 0%, 0%, 0% for
an assignment with 10 items.The assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up
to 20% either way to give the submission's final grade.</li>
<li><b>Criterion Grading:</b> This is simpliest type of assessment to grade (although
not necessarily the most straightforward to set up). The submissions are
graded against a set of criteria statments. The assessor choses which statement
best fits the piece of work. The grade is determined by a &quot;Criteria
Table&quot; which gives the suggested grade for each criterion. For example
an assignment may be set up with, say, five criteria statements and the assessors
must then choose one of the five statements for each of their assessments. As with
the Banded assignment the assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up to
20% to give the final grade.</li>
<li><b>Error Banded Grading:</b> In this type of assignment the submissions are
graded on a set of Yes/No scales. The grade is determined by the &quot;Grade
Table &quot; which gives the relationship between the number of
&quot;errors&quot; and the suggested grade. For example an assignment may have six
significant items which should be present, the Grade Table will give suggested
grades if all are present, one is absent, if two are absent, etc. The individual
items can, if desired, be given weighting factors if some items are more important
than others. The number of &quot;errors&quot; is a weighted sum of the items not
present. By default each item is given a weight of one. The grading table is likely
to be non-linear, for example
the suggested grades may be 90%, 70%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, 0%, 0%, 0% for
an assignment with 10 items.The assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up
to 20% either way to give the submission's final grade.</li>
<li><b>Criterion Grading:</b> This is the simplest type of assessment to grade (although
not necessarily the most straightforward to set up). The submissions are
graded against a set of criteria statements. The assessor chooses which statement
best fits the piece of work. The grade is determined by a &quot;Criteria
Table&quot; which gives the suggested grade for each criterion. For example
an assignment may be set up with, say, five criteria statements and the assessors
must then choose one of the five statements for each of their assessments. As with
the Banded assignment the assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up to
20% to give the final grade.</li>
<li><b>Rubric</b> This is a similar to Criterion Grading except there are multiple
sets of criteria. Each set covering a particular &quot;Category&quot;, can have
up to five statements. The sets are given individual
weights and the grade is a weighted combination of the scores from each set. There
is <b>no</b> adjustment option in this assessment type. </li>
sets of criteria. Each set covering a particular &quot;Category&quot;, can have
up to five statements. The sets are given individual
weights and the grade is a weighted combination of the scores from each set. There
is <b>no</b> adjustment option in this assessment type. </li>
</ol>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1 +1 @@
<p>Exercises</p>
<p>Exercises</p>
+62 -62
View File
@@ -1,85 +1,85 @@
<p align="center"><b>Managing an Exercise Assignment</b></p>
<p>An Exercise Assignment is slightly more complex than an ordinary assignment.
It involves three steps or phases. These are</p>
It involves three steps or phases. These are</p>
<ol>
<li><p><b>Set up Exercise </b> The assessment of the work produced in the
exercise is made easier if it is broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS.
This makes the grading of an assignment less
arbitary and gives the students a framework on which to make assessments.
The teacher has the role of setting up the assessment elements thus making a
grading sheet. (See that page for more details.)</p>
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher must submit a
Word Document or HTML file which describes the exercise or task to be done
by the students. This file is shown to the students in the second phase of
the exercise. </p>
<p>Teachers can, if they wish, prepare a set of similar exercies, again as
Word Documents or HTML files, and upload those into the Exercise. Note that
these exercises must be quite similar as the same Assessment Form is used
for all of these variants. The submission of a multiple set of exercises by
the teacher is optional and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Students Assessments and Submissions</b> The assignment
is now opened to the students. If the teacher has set up multiple exercises then
the students see different exercises, otherwise all the students see the same
exercise.</p>
<li><p><b>Set up Exercise </b> The assessment of the work produced in the
exercise is made easier if it is broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS.
This makes the grading of an assignment less
arbitrary and gives the students a framework on which to make assessments.
The teacher has the role of setting up the assessment elements thus making a
grading sheet. (See that page for more details.)</p>
<p>Before the students can submit their work they must complete the assessment
form. Once they have completed the assessment they are shown the upload form.
The students can revise their work in the light of their self assessment. </p>
<p>Once student work has been submitted the teacher can begin assessing it. The link &quot;Student Submissions for Assessment&quot; displays a page showing those peices of work which have not been assessed. The oldest submission is at the top of the page. The assessment form for each of these submissions is initially based on the student's own assessment of their work. The teacher can change those assessments and add any comments. At the end of the two buttons let the teacher decide whether the student can re-submit the work or not.</p>
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher must submit a
Word Document or HTML file which describes the exercise or task to be done
by the students. This file is shown to the students in the second phase of
the exercise. </p>
<p>If the teacher has decided to allow the student to re-submit and they have done so, the teacher is how the new piece of work. In this case the assessment form will contain the teacher's old assessment. The
same option, re-submit or not, allows the teacher to control this cycle of
re-submission and assessment. If students are allowed to put in multiple pieces
of work into the Exercise, the teacher should decide whether the final grades
are based on the student's maximum grade or their average grade over the
set of submissions. This option can be changed at any time during the Exercise
by updating the Exercise, it's effect is seen immediately in the Grade page.
<p>Teachers can, if they wish, prepare a set of similar exercise, again as
Word Documents or HTML files, and upload those into the Exercise. Note that
these exercises must be quite similar as the same Assessment Form is used
for all of these variants. The submission of a multiple set of exercises by
the teacher is optional and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Students Assessments and Submissions</b> The assignment
is now opened to the students. If the teacher has set up multiple exercises then
the students see different exercises, otherwise all the students see the same
exercise.</p>
<p>Before the students can submit their work they must complete the assessment
form. Once they have completed the assessment they are shown the upload form.
The students can revise their work in the light of their self assessment. </p>
<p>Once student work has been submitted the teacher can begin assessing it. The link &quot;Student Submissions for Assessment&quot; displays a page showing those pieces of work which have not been assessed. The oldest submission is at the top of the page. The assessment form for each of these submissions is initially based on the student's own assessment of their work. The teacher can change those assessments and add any comments. At the end of the two buttons let the teacher decide whether the student can re-submit the work or not.</p>
<p>If the teacher has decided to allow the student to re-submit and they have done so, the teacher is how the new piece of work. In this case the assessment form will contain the teacher's old assessment. The
same option, re-submit or not, allows the teacher to control this cycle of
re-submission and assessment. If students are allowed to put in multiple pieces
of work into the Exercise, the teacher should decide whether the final grades
are based on the student's maximum grade or their average grade over the
set of submissions. This option can be changed at any time during the Exercise
by updating the Exercise, it's effect is seen immediately in the Grade page.
</p>
<p>When the assignment's deadline is reached a student can submit or re-submit work.
The work is flagged as &quot;late&quot;. The work appears in the list of work to
be assessed and the teacher can, if desired, assess the work in the normal way.
In the various lists of peices of work the submission date is shown as red (and
in the list of work to be be marked the period since submission is also shown in
red). If graded, the grade of late work is shown in red and in brackets. Such
grades are <b>not</b> used in the calculation of final grades and are not counted
in the Grades pages. The teacher can clear the late flag by going into in the
Administration page and clicking on the appropriate link. The work will then be
In the various lists of pieces of work the submission date is shown as red (and
in the list of work to be marked the period since submission is also shown in
red). If graded, the grade of late work is shown in red and in brackets. Such
grades are <b>not</b> used in the calculation of final grades and are not counted
in the Grades pages. The teacher can clear the late flag by going into in the
Administration page and clicking on the appropriate link. The work will then be
used in the calculation of the final grade. </p></li>
<li><p><b>Show Overall Grades and League Table</b> In this final phase of
the Exercise the students can see their &quot;final&quot; grades. In all
phases of the Exercise (except the first phase), grades are available to
the students, they are, however, only &quot;partial&quot; grades as they are
calculated on the fly from the assessments available at the time.</p>
<p>In this final phase, students <b>cannot</b> make any further submissions.
In effect the assignment is closed and the teacher has the option of showing
<li><p><b>Show Overall Grades and League Table</b> In this final phase of
the Exercise the students can see their &quot;final&quot; grades. In all
phases of the Exercise (except the first phase), grades are available to
the students, they are, however, only &quot;partial&quot; grades as they are
calculated on the fly from the assessments available at the time.</p>
<p>In this final phase, students <b>cannot</b> make any further submissions.
In effect the assignment is closed and the teacher has the option of showing
the students examples of the best pieces of work submitted...</p>
<p>The students (and the teacher) can also be shown a &quot;League Table&quot;
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top
submission is first. Here the grade given to the submission is teacher's
grade. If a student submitted more than one piece of work only their best
grade. If a student submitted more than one piece of work only their best
piece of work is shown in this table. If the number of entries in the table
is set to zero then this table is not displayed.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>The student's grade for the Exercise is the sum of their grading grade of
their (initial) assessment and the grade for their submission(s). The
maximum values for these grades are given when the Exercise are set up.
<p>The student's grade for the Exercise is the sum of their grading grade of
their (initial) assessment and the grade for their submission(s). The
maximum values for these grades are given when the Exercise are set up.
However, these maximum values can be changed (by updating the Exercise)
at any time during the exercise and the grades shown both the students
at any time during the exercise and the grades shown both the students
and the teacher always reflect the current maximum values.</p>
<p>At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the &quot;Administration&quot;
page. It lists the students' assessments (of their own work) and the
submissions of the students. The teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess
submissions, re-grade assessments, delete submissions and assessments,
and generally watch the progress of the assignment.</p>
page. It lists the students' assessments (of their own work) and the
submissions of the students. The teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess
submissions, re-grade assessments, delete submissions and assessments,
and generally watch the progress of the assignment.</p>
+68 -68
View File
@@ -1,87 +1,87 @@
<img alt valign="middle" src="<?php echo $CFG->wwwroot?>/mod/exercise/icon.gif">&nbsp;<b>Exercise</b>
<p>An Exercise is a simple but powerful assignment. In an exercise the teacher
<p>An Exercise is a simple but powerful assignment. In an exercise the teacher
asks the students to do a piece of practical work. It could be writing an
essay or a report, preparing a presentation, or setting out a spreadsheet,
etc. When the student has done the task they must first self-assess their
work before submitting it to the teacher. Once submitted the teacher
assesses the student's piece of work using the same assessment form. The
essay or a report, preparing a presentation, or setting out a spreadsheet,
etc. When the student has done the task they must first self-assess their
work before submitting it to the teacher. Once submitted the teacher
assesses the student's piece of work using the same assessment form. The
teacher can give feedback to the student and ask the student to improve
the work and re-submit it or not as the case may be. The final grade is
based on how well the student assessed their own work and the work itself.</p>
<p>Before the start of the exercise the teacher sets up the exercise by
<ol> <li>Creating a Word document or HTML file which introduces the exercise
and tells the students what they have to produce. This file is uploaded
into the exercise by the teacher.</li>
<ol> <li>Creating a Word document or HTML file which introduces the exercise
and tells the students what they have to produce. This file is uploaded
into the exercise by the teacher.</li>
<li>Adding the textual elements and choosing the options in the Assessment
Form. This form is used by both the students and the teacher to assess the
work produced in the exercise. There are various types of assessment
which can be used (see the help on &quot;Grading Stratgey&quot;)</li>
Form. This form is used by both the students and the teacher to assess the
work produced in the exercise. There are various types of assessment
which can be used (see the help on &quot;Grading Strategy&quot;)</li>
</ol></p>
<p>In large classes, the teacher may find to helpful to create more than one version
of the exercise. These variants add a degree of variety to the exercise and
ensure that students are doing different tasks in the exercise. They
are allocated to the students in a random but balanced way. Each student
receives only one exercise but the the number of
times each variant is allocated in a class is approximately the same. Note
the variants should not be too different as the same assessment form is used for
all of the variants.</p>
of the exercise. These variants add a degree of variety to the exercise and
ensure that students are doing different tasks in the exercise. They
are allocated to the students in a random but balanced way. Each student
receives only one exercise but the number of
times each variant is allocated in a class is approximately the same. Note
the variants should not be too different as the same assessment form is used for
all of the variants.</p>
<p>With the description(s) of the exercise and the assessment form in place,
the assignment is opened to the students. They are shown a description
of the exercise or task. When they have done the exercise they must assess
their own work (using the pre-prepared assessment form) before they can
submit their work to the teacher. The assessment form can be used as a
&quot;checklist&quot; by the students. They can, if they wish, revise both
their work and the assessment before they actually submit their work, and
probably they should be encouraged to do so!</p>
<p>Once a student has submitted their work both their assessment and the piece
the assignment is opened to the students. They are shown a description
of the exercise or task. When they have done the exercise they must assess
their own work (using the pre-prepared assessment form) before they can
submit their work to the teacher. The assessment form can be used as a
&quot;checklist&quot; by the students. They can, if they wish, revise both
their work and the assessment before they actually submit their work, and
probably they should be encouraged to do so!</p>
<p>Once a student has submitted their work both their assessment and the piece
of work itself becomes available to the teacher. The teacher accesses the
pieces of work (using the student's assessment as a starting point) and
make a decision whether to ask the student to re-submit an improved
pieces of work (using the student's assessment as a starting point) and
make a decision whether to ask the student to re-submit an improved
version of the work or not.</p>
<p>If the teacher feels that the student's piece of work could be improved, the
student can be given the opprtunity to re-submit. If this is taken up the
teacher re-assesses the work using an assessment form which contains
the grades and comments they gave to the student's previous submission.
Thus, the re-assessment is then a matter of updating the form in the light
of the student revised work rather than undertaking an assessment from
scratch.</p>
<p>When the deadline for the exercise is reached students can continue to submit.
However, such work is flagged as &quot;late&quot;. The teacher can, if
desired, grade the work and give feedback to the student. The grades of
late work are held back and are <b>not</b> used in the calculation of final
grades. If, for whatever reason, the teacher wishes to accept a piece of
late work as a normal piece of work the late flag can be cleared by going
into the Administration page, finding the submission and clicking on the
appropriate link. The grade for that work will then be used in the calculation
of a final grades.</p>
<p>When all the submissions have been graded, the exercise is moved to the
<p>If the teacher feels that the student's piece of work could be improved, the
student can be given the opportunity to re-submit. If this is taken up the
teacher re-assesses the work using an assessment form which contains
the grades and comments they gave to the student's previous submission.
Thus, the re-assessment is then a matter of updating the form in the light
of the student revised work rather than undertaking an assessment from
scratch.</p>
<p>When the deadline for the exercise is reached students can continue to submit.
However, such work is flagged as &quot;late&quot;. The teacher can, if
desired, grade the work and give feedback to the student. The grades of
late work are held back and are <b>not</b> used in the calculation of final
grades. If, for whatever reason, the teacher wishes to accept a piece of
late work as a normal piece of work the late flag can be cleared by going
into the Administration page, finding the submission and clicking on the
appropriate link. The grade for that work will then be used in the calculation
of a final grades.</p>
<p>When all the submissions have been graded, the exercise is moved to the
final phase. Further student submissions are now not allowed. The students
can now see their final grades together with the grades given to their
submission(s). A student's grade for the exercise is the sum of the
student's &quot;grading grade&quot;, a measure of the agreement between
the student's assessment and the teacher's assessment of the student's
(first) submission, and the teacher's grade(s) for the student's
submission(s). (The grade given by the student in their assesment is
can now see their final grades together with the grades given to their
submission(s). A student's grade for the exercise is the sum of the
student's &quot;grading grade&quot;, a measure of the agreement between
the student's assessment and the teacher's assessment of the student's
(first) submission, and the teacher's grade(s) for the student's
submission(s). (The grade given by the student in their assessment is
<b>not</b> used.) </p>
<p>When the teacher allows students to resubmit work, the teacher should
consider how to set the option which controls how the student's final grade
is calculated from multiple submissions. This option allows the teacher to
choose between using the mean grade of the student's submissions or their
best submission. This option can changed at any time and it has an immediate
effect in the grades screen.</p>
<p>When the teacher allows students to resubmit work, the teacher should
consider how to set the option which controls how the student's final grade
is calculated from multiple submissions. This option allows the teacher to
choose between using the mean grade of the student's submissions or their
best submission. This option can changed at any time and it has an immediate
effect in the grades screen.</p>
<p>In the final phase of the exercise the students can also see a &quot;League
Table&quot; of submissions. This an ordered list of the submissions, the
submission which received the highest grade is at the top. When there are
multiple submissions only the student's best submission is show in this list.</p>
Table&quot; of submissions. This an ordered list of the submissions, the
submission which received the highest grade is at the top. When there are
multiple submissions only the student's best submission is show in this list.</p>
+14 -14
View File
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
<p align="center"><b>Number of Comments, Elements, Bands, Criteria or Rubrics</b></p>
<p>The number entered here determines how many items will be used in
the assessments. Depending on the type of grading strategy, this number
gives the number of comments, assessments elements, bands, criteria or
categories (sets) of criteria in a rubric. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 assessment items, the actual number depending on
the assessments. Depending on the type of grading strategy, this number
gives the number of comments, assessments elements, bands, criteria or
categories (sets) of criteria in a rubric. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 assessment items, the actual number depending on
the size and complexity of the assignment.</p>
<p>During the set up phase of the exercise this number can safely be adjusted.
Increasing this number will cause extra blank elements to be displayed in the
asessemnt form. Reducing this number will remove elements from the end
of the assessment form.</p>
<p>All assessments have a General Comments field. For a &quot;No
Grading&quot; assignment the value given here determines the
number of additional comment areas. It can be specified as zero and results
in the assessment having only a single General Comments area.</p>
<p>During the set up phase of the exercise this number can safely be adjusted.
Increasing this number will cause extra blank elements to be displayed in the
assessment form. Reducing this number will remove elements from the end
of the assessment form.</p>
<p>All assessments have a General Comments field. For a &quot;No
Grading&quot; assignment the value given here determines the
number of additional comment areas. It can be specified as zero and results
in the assessment having only a single General Comments area.</p>
+10 -10
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
<p align="center"><b>Re-grading Student Assessments</b></p>
<p>This link re-calculates the &quot;Grading grades&quot; of all the student
assessments. Normally it is <b>not</b> necessary to action this
re-calculation. New student assessments are automatically graded after the
teacher has assessed the relavant piece of work from the student.</p>
<p>This link re-calculates the &quot;Grading grades&quot; of all the student
assessments. Normally it is <b>not</b> necessary to action this
re-calculation. New student assessments are automatically graded after the
teacher has assessed the relevant piece of work from the student.</p>
<p>If, however, the Grading grades are felt to be too high or too low the
teacher may wish to change the &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option
(by Updating the Exercise). The default value of this option is
&quot;Fair&quot;. If the grading grades are too high then setting the
<p>If, however, the Grading grades are felt to be too high or too low the
teacher may wish to change the &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option
(by Updating the Exercise). The default value of this option is
&quot;Fair&quot;. If the grading grades are too high then setting the
option to either &quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; will reduce
the grades. Or alternatively if the grades are too low, setting the option
the grades. Or alternatively if the grades are too low, setting the option
to &quot; Lax&quot; or &quot;Very Lax&quot; will increase the grades.</p>
<p>If a change to the Grading grades is required the steps are:
<ol>
<li>Update the Exercise with the new value of the Comparison of Assessments
option;</li>
<li>Go to to the Exercise's Administration page and click on the
<li>Go to the Exercise's Administration page and click on the
&quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link.</li>
</ol>
The new grades will be displayed. These process can be safely repeated.</p>
+8 -8
View File
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
<p align="center"><b>Specimen Assessment Form</b></p>
<p>This page shows shows the details of the actual form used to grade
your assignment. It will be used by yourself and the teacher to grade your
work.</p>
<p>Please note that although you can change the grades on
this form these changes are NOT saved. This is simply a specimen form,
but a very similar form will be used by yourself and the teacher
during this assignment.</p>
<p>This page shows the details of the actual form used to grade
your assignment. It will be used by yourself and the teacher to grade your
work.</p>
<p>Please note that although you can change the grades on
this form these changes are NOT saved. This is simply a specimen form,
but a very similar form will be used by yourself and the teacher
during this assignment.</p>
+9 -9
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<p align="center"><b>Take Ownership of the Exercises</b></p>
<p>This link allows the teacher to take ownership of the current set of exercise
submissions. You will need to do this if you have imported an exercise from a
backup of another course. This link allows you to &quot;claim&quot;
all the exercise submissions. In the current course these imported submissions
could belong to anyone, even a student. This procedure avoids any problems
that this may cause and makes you their owner.</p>
<p>Apart from onwership, the submissions themselves are unchanged by this
procedure.</p>
<p>This link allows the teacher to take ownership of the current set of exercise
submissions. You will need to do this if you have imported an exercise from a
backup of another course. This link allows you to &quot;claim&quot;
all the exercise submissions. In the current course these imported submissions
could belong to anyone, even a student. This procedure avoids any problems
that this may cause and makes you their owner.</p>
<p>Apart from ownership, the submissions themselves are unchanged by this
procedure.</p>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
<p>This option allows you to select the number of articles
to include in the RSS Feed.</p>
<p>A number between 5 and 20 should be appropiate for
<p>A number between 5 and 20 should be appropriate for
most forums. Increase it if the forum is very used.</p>
+7 -7
View File
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
<p align="center"><b>Forum Subscription</b></p>
<p>When a person is subscribed to a forum it means that
<p>When a person is subscribed to a forum it means that
they will be sent email copies of every post in that forum
(posts are sent about <?php echo $CFG->maxeditingtime/60 ?> minutes
(posts are sent about <?php echo $CFG->maxeditingtime/60 ?> minutes
after the post was first written).
</p>
<p>People can usually choose whether or not they want to be
<p>People can usually choose whether or not they want to be
subscribed to each forum.
</p>
<p>However, if you choose to force subscription on a particular forum
<p>However, if you choose to force subscription on a particular forum
then all course users will be subscribed automatically, even those that
enrol at a later time.
</p>
<p>This is especially useful in the News forum and in forums
towards the beginning of the course (before everyone has
towards the beginning of the course (before everyone has
worked out that they can subscribe to these emails themselves).
</p>
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ they can unsubscribe themselves at any time. If you choose "Yes, forever"
then they will not be able to unsubscribe themselves.
</p>
<p>Note how the "Yes, initially" option behaves when you update an exisitng
<p>Note how the "Yes, initially" option behaves when you update an existing
forum: Changing from "Yes, initially" to "No" will not unsubscribe
existing users, it will only affect future course users. Similarly changing
later to "Yes, initially" will not subscribe existing course users
but only those enrolling later.
but only those enrolling later.
</p>
+34 -34
View File
@@ -3,51 +3,51 @@
<p>General</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="help.php?file=cookies.html">Cookies</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=directorypaths.html">Directory paths</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=cookies.html">Cookies</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=directorypaths.html">Directory paths</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Administration</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="help.php?file=langedit.html">Language editing</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=uploadusers.html">Upload users</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=langedit.html">Language editing</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=uploadusers.html">Upload users</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Setting up courses</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="help.php?file=mods.html">Activity Modules</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=mods.html">Activity Modules</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursereports.html">Activity Reports</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseavailability.html">Course availability</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursecategory.html">Course categories</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseformats.html">Course formats</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursefullname.html">Course fullname</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseidnumber.html">Course ID number</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursenewsitems.html">Course news items</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursenumsections.html">Course number of weeks/topics</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseshortname.html">Course short name</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursestartdate.html">Course start date</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseuploadsize.html">Course upload size</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=enrolmentkey.html">Enrollment keys</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursegrades.html">Grades</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=groupmode.html">Group mode</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=groupmodeforce.html">Group mode (forcing)</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=guestaccess.html">Guest access</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courserecent.html">Recent Activity</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=scales.html">Scales</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=summaries.html">Section summaries</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=teachers.html">Teachers</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=picture.html">Uploading a picture</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseavailability.html">Course availability</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursecategory.html">Course categories</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseformats.html">Course formats</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursefullname.html">Course fullname</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseidnumber.html">Course ID number</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursenewsitems.html">Course news items</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursenumsections.html">Course number of weeks/topics</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseshortname.html">Course short name</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursestartdate.html">Course start date</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courseuploadsize.html">Course upload size</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=enrolmentkey.html">Enrollment keys</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=coursegrades.html">Grades</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=groupmode.html">Group mode</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=groupmodeforce.html">Group mode (forcing)</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=guestaccess.html">Guest access</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=courserecent.html">Recent Activity</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=scales.html">Scales</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=summaries.html">Section summaries</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=teachers.html">Teachers</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=picture.html">Uploading a picture</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Reading and Writing</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="help.php?file=questions.html">Asking Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=reading.html">Reading</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=writing.html">Writing</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=textformat.html">Formatting Text</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=html.html">Editing HTML format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=text.html">Edting Text format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=wiki.html">Editing Wiki format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=richtext.html">Using the Richtext HTML editor</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=emoticons.html">Using Smilies (emoticons)</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=questions.html">Asking Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=reading.html">Reading</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=writing.html">Writing</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=textformat.html">Formatting Text</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=html.html">Editing HTML format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=text.html">Editing Text format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=wiki.html">Editing Wiki format</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=richtext.html">Using the Richtext HTML editor</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?file=emoticons.html">Using Smilies (emoticons)</a></li>
</ul>
+6 -6
View File
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Jump-to Link</b></p>
<p>Each answer has a Jump-to link. When this answer is chosen, the answer's response
is shown to the student. Atfer that the student sees the page given in the Jump-to
link. This link can be either relative or absolute. Relative links are <b>This
page</b> and <b>Next page</b>. <b>This page</b> means that the student sees the
<p>Each answer has a Jump-to link. When this answer is chosen, the answer's response
is shown to the student. After that the student sees the page given in the Jump-to
link. This link can be either relative or absolute. Relative links are <b>This
page</b> and <b>Next page</b>. <b>This page</b> means that the student sees the
current page again. <b>Next page</b> shows the page which follows this page in the
logical order of pages. An absolute page link is specified by choosing the page's
logical order of pages. An absolute page link is specified by choosing the page's
<b>title</b>.</p>
<p>Note that a (relative) <b>Next page</b> Jump-to link may show a different page
<p>Note that a (relative) <b>Next page</b> Jump-to link may show a different page
after pages have been moved. Whereas Jump-to links which use page <b>titles</b>
always show the same page after pages have been moved.</p>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Maximum Number of Attempts (by a Student)</b></p>
<p>This value determines the maximum number of attempts a Student has
in aswering <b>any</b> of the questions in the lesson. In the case of questions
in answering <b>any</b> of the questions in the lesson. In the case of questions
which do not provide the answer, for example Short Answer
and Numerical questions, this value provides a necessary <i>escape routine</i> to
the next page in the lesson. </p>
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
<p>Note that this value is global parameter and that it applies to all the
questions in the lesson regardless of their type.</p>
<p>Note that this parameter does <b>not</b> apply to teachers checking
of questions or navigating through the lesson. Checking the number of attempts
relies on values stored in the database and question attempts by teachers are
+8 -8
View File
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Minimum Number of Questions in a Lesson</b></p>
<p>When a lesson contains one or more Branch Tables the teacher should
<p>When a lesson contains one or more Branch Tables the teacher should
normally set this parameter. Its value sets a lower limit on the number of
quesions seen when a grade is calculated. It does <b>not</b> force students
questions seen when a grade is calculated. It does <b>not</b> force students
to answer that many questions in the lesson</p>
<p>For example, setting this parameter to, say, 20, will ensure that grades are
given as though the students have seen <b>at least</b> this number of
given as though the students have seen <b>at least</b> this number of
questions. Take the case of a student who only looks at a single branch in
a lesson with, say, 5 pages and answers all the associated questions
a lesson with, say, 5 pages and answers all the associated questions
correctly. They then choose to end the lesson (assuming there is that option
in the &quot;top level&quot;Branch Table, a reasonable enough assumption).
in the &quot;top level&quot;Branch Table, a reasonable enough assumption).
If this parameter were left unset their grade would be 5 out of 5, that is
100%. However, with it set to 20 their grade would be reduced to 5 out of
20, that is 25%. In the case of another student who goes through all the
100%. However, with it set to 20 their grade would be reduced to 5 out of
20, that is 25%. In the case of another student who goes through all the
branches and sees, say, 25 pages and answers all but two of the questions
correctly, then their grade would be 23 out of 25, that is 92%.</p>
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
something like:</p>
<p><blockquote>In this lesson you are expected to attempt at least n questions.
You can attempt more if you wish. However, if you attempt less than n
You can attempt more if you wish. However, if you attempt less than n
questions your grade will be calculated as though you attempted n.</blockquote></p>
<p>Where obviously &quot;n&quot; is replaced by the actual value this parameter
+34 -34
View File
@@ -3,28 +3,28 @@
<ol>
<li>A lesson is made up of a number of <b>pages</b> and optionally <b>branch
tables</b>.</li>
<li>A page contains some <b>content</b> and it normally ends with a
<li>A page contains some <b>content</b> and it normally ends with a
<b>question</b>. Thus the term <b>Question Page</b>.</li>
<li>Each page normally has a set of <b>answers</b>. </li>
<li>Each answer can have a short piece of text which is displayed if the answer is
chosen. This piece of text is called the <b>response</b>.</li>
<li>Also associated with each answer is a <b>jump</b>. The jump can be relative -
this page, next page - or absolute - specifying any one of the pages in the
<li>Also associated with each answer is a <b>jump</b>. The jump can be relative -
this page, next page - or absolute - specifying any one of the pages in the
lesson or the end of the lesson.</li>
<li>By default, the first answer jumps to the <b>next page</b> in the lesson.
The subsequent answers jump to the same page. That is, the student is shown
<li>By default, the first answer jumps to the <b>next page</b> in the lesson.
The subsequent answers jump to the same page. That is, the student is shown
the same page of the lesson again if they do not chose the first answer.
<li>The next page is determined by the lesson's <b>logical order</b>. This is
the order of the pages as seen by the teacher. This order can be altered
<li>The next page is determined by the lesson's <b>logical order</b>. This is
the order of the pages as seen by the teacher. This order can be altered
by moving pages within the lesson.</li>
<li>The lesson also has a <b>navigation order</b>. This is the order of the
<li>The lesson also has a <b>navigation order</b>. This is the order of the
pages as seen by the students. This is determined by the jumps specified
for individual answers and it can be very different from the logical order.
(Although if the jumps are <i>not</i> changed from their default values
the two are strongly related.) The teacher has the option to check the
the two are strongly related.) The teacher has the option to check the
navigation order.</li>
<li>When displayed to the students, the answers are usually shuffled. That is,
the first answer from the teacher's point of view will not necessarily be
<li>When displayed to the students, the answers are usually shuffled. That is,
the first answer from the teacher's point of view will not necessarily be
the first answer in the list shown to the students. (Further, each time the
same set of answers is displayed they are likely to appear in a different
order.) The exception is sets of answers for matching-type questions, here
@@ -34,63 +34,63 @@
with one correct answer and three, say, distractors. </li>
<li>It is possible to set up a page without any answers. The students are shown
a <b>Continue</b> link instead of the set of shuffled answers.</li>
<li>For the purposes of grading the lessons, <b>correct</b> answers are ones which
jump to a page which is further <i>down</i> the logical order than the current page.
<li>For the purposes of grading the lessons, <b>correct</b> answers are ones which
jump to a page which is further <i>down</i> the logical order than the current page.
<b>Wrong</b> answers are ones which either jump to the same page or to a page
further <i>up</i> the logical order than the current page. Thus, if the jumps are
<i>not</i> changed, the first answer is a correct answer and the other answers are
<i>not</i> changed, the first answer is a correct answer and the other answers are
wrong answers.</li>
<li>Questions can have more than one correct answer. For example, if two of the answers
jump to the next page then either answer is taken as a correct answer. (Although
the same destination page is shown to the students, the responses shown on the way
the same destination page is shown to the students, the responses shown on the way
to that page may well be different for the two answers.)
<li>In the teacher's view of the lesson the correct answers have underlined Answer
<li>In the teacher's view of the lesson the correct answers have underlined Answer
Labels.</li>
<li><b>Branch tables</b> are simply pages which have a set of links to other
<li><b>Branch tables</b> are simply pages which have a set of links to other
pages in the lesson. Typically a lesson may start with a branch table which
acts as a <b>Table of Contents</b>.</li>
<li>Each link in a branch table has two components, a description and the title
of the page to jump to.</li>
<li>A branch table effectively divides the lesson into a number of
<b>branches</b> (or sections). Each branch can contain a number of pages
(probably all related to the same topic). The end of a branch is usually
marked by an <b>End of Branch</b> page. This is a special page which, by
default, returns the student back to the preceeding branch table. (The
&quot;return&quot; jump in an End of Branch page can be changed, if
<li>A branch table effectively divides the lesson into a number of
<b>branches</b> (or sections). Each branch can contain a number of pages
(probably all related to the same topic). The end of a branch is usually
marked by an <b>End of Branch</b> page. This is a special page which, by
default, returns the student back to the preceding branch table. (The
&quot;return&quot; jump in an End of Branch page can be changed, if
required, by editing the page.) </li>
<li>There can be more than one branch table in a lesson. For example, a lesson
might usefully be structured so that specialist points are sub-branches
within the main subject branches.</li>
<li>It is important to give students a means of ending the lesson. This might
be done by including an &quot;End Lesson&quot; link in the main branch
be done by including an &quot;End Lesson&quot; link in the main branch
table. This jumps to the (imaginary) <b>End of Lesson</b> page. Another
option is for the last branch in the lesson (here &quot;last&quot; is used
in the logical ordering sense) to simply continue to the end of the lesson,
that is, it is <i>not</i> terminated by an End of Branch page.</li>
<li>When a lesson includes one or more branch tables it is advisable to set the
&quot;Minimum number of Questions&quot; parameter to some reasonable value.
This sets a lower limit on the number of pages seen when the grade is
This sets a lower limit on the number of pages seen when the grade is
calculated. Without this parameter a student might visit a single branch
in the lesson, answer all its questions correctly and leave the lesson
in the lesson, answer all its questions correctly and leave the lesson
with the maximum grade.</li>
<li>Further, when a branch table is present a student has the opportunity of
re-visiting the same branch more than once. However, the grade is
re-visiting the same branch more than once. However, the grade is
calculated using the number of <i>unique</i> questions answered. So
repeatedly answering the same set of questions does <i>not</i> increase
the grade. (In fact, the reverse is true, it lowers the grade as the count
of the number of pages seen is used in the denominator when calculating
grades does include repeats.) In order to give students a fair idea of
of the number of pages seen is used in the denominator when calculating
grades does include repeats.) In order to give students a fair idea of
their progress in the lesson, they are shown details of how many questions
they are answered correctly, number of pages seen, and their current grade
on every branch table page.</li>
<li>The <b>end of the lesson</b> is reached by either jumping to that location explicitly
<li>The <b>end of the lesson</b> is reached by either jumping to that location explicitly
or by jumping to the next page from the last (logical) page of the lesson. When the
end of the lesson is reached, the student receives a congratulations message and is
shown their grade. The grade is (the number of questions correctly answered / number of
end of the lesson is reached, the student receives a congratulations message and is
shown their grade. The grade is (the number of questions correctly answered / number of
pages seen) * the grade of the lesson.</li>
<li>If the end of the lesson is <i>not</i> reached and the student just leaves,
when the student goes into the lesson again they are given the choice of
starting at the begining or picking up the lesson where they answered their
when the student goes into the lesson again they are given the choice of
starting at the beginning or picking up the lesson where they answered their
last correct answer.</li>
<li> For a lesson which allow re-takes, the teacher has the choice of using the
best grade or the average of the grades as the &quot;final&quot; grade from
+77 -77
View File
@@ -3,133 +3,133 @@
<p>The types of Questions currently supported by the Lesson module are:
<ol>
<li><p><b>Multichoice</b> This is the default question type. Multichoice questions
are popular questions where the student is asked to choose one answer from a
set of alternatives. The correct answer takes the student further into the
lesson, the wrong answers do not. The wrong answers are sometimes called the
&quot;distractors&quot; and the utility of these questions often rely more
<li><p><b>Multichoice</b> This is the default question type. Multichoice questions
are popular questions where the student is asked to choose one answer from a
set of alternatives. The correct answer takes the student further into the
lesson, the wrong answers do not. The wrong answers are sometimes called the
&quot;distractors&quot; and the utility of these questions often rely more
on the quality of the distractors than either the questions themselves or their
correct answers.</p>
<p> Each answer can optionally have a response. If no response is
entered for an answer then the default reponse &quot;That's the Correct
<p> Each answer can optionally have a response. If no response is
entered for an answer then the default response &quot;That's the Correct
Answer&quot; or &quot;That's the Wrong Answer&quot; is shown to the student.
</p>
<p>It is possible to have more than one correct answer to a multichoice question.
The different correct answers may give the student different responses and
jump to different (forward) pages in the lesson but
<p>It is possible to have more than one correct answer to a multichoice question.
The different correct answers may give the student different responses and
jump to different (forward) pages in the lesson but
do not vary in their grades, (that is, some answers are <b>not</b> more correct
than others, at least in terms of grade.) It is possible for all the answers
to be correct and they might take the student to different (forward) parts of
the lesson depending on which one is choosen.</p>
than others, at least in terms of grade.) It is possible for all the answers
to be correct and they might take the student to different (forward) parts of
the lesson depending on which one is chosen.</p>
<p>There is variant of Multichoice questions called <b>&quot;Multichoice
Multianswer&quot;</b> questions. These require the student to select all the
correct answers from the set of answers. The question may or may not tell
the student how many correct answers there are. For example &quot;Which of the
following were US Presidents?&quot; does not, while "Select the two US
presidents from the following list." does. The actual number of correct
answers can be from <b>one</b> up to the number of choices. (A Multichoice
Multianswer question with one correct answer <b>is</b> different from a
Multichoice question as the former allows the student the possibility of
<p>There is variant of Multichoice questions called <b>&quot;Multichoice
Multianswer&quot;</b> questions. These require the student to select all the
correct answers from the set of answers. The question may or may not tell
the student how many correct answers there are. For example &quot;Which of the
following were US Presidents?&quot; does not, while "Select the two US
presidents from the following list." does. The actual number of correct
answers can be from <b>one</b> up to the number of choices. (A Multichoice
Multianswer question with one correct answer <b>is</b> different from a
Multichoice question as the former allows the student the possibility of
choosing more than one answer while the latter does not.)</p>
<p>Again the correct answers are flagged using forward jumps, the wrong answers
by same page or backward jumps. When there is more than one correct answer
the jumps should all go to the same page, similarily with the wrong answers.
<p>Again the correct answers are flagged using forward jumps, the wrong answers
by same page or backward jumps. When there is more than one correct answer
the jumps should all go to the same page, similarly with the wrong answers.
If that is <b>not</b> the case a warning is given on the teacher's view of
the lesson. The correct response, if required, should be given on the first
correct answer and the wrong response, if required, should be on the first
wrong answer. Responses on the other answers are ignored (without warning).
</p></li>
<li><p><b>Short Answer</b> The student is prompted for a short piece of text.
This is checked against one or more answers. Answers can be either correct
or wrong. Each answer can optionally have a response. If no response is
entered for an answer then the default reponse &quot;That's the Correct
<li><p><b>Short Answer</b> The student is prompted for a short piece of text.
This is checked against one or more answers. Answers can be either correct
or wrong. Each answer can optionally have a response. If no response is
entered for an answer then the default response &quot;That's the Correct
Answer&quot; or &quot;That's the Wrong Answer&quot; is shown to the student.
If the text entered does not match any of the answers the question is wrong
and the student is shown the default wrong response.
and the student is shown the default wrong response.
</p>
<p>By default the comparisons ignore the case of the text. There is an option
<p>By default the comparisons ignore the case of the text. There is an option
to make the comparisons case sensitive.</p>
<p>The asterix (*) character can be used in answers as a &quot;wild card&quot;
character. It stands for any number of characters (including no charcters
at all). For example, the answer &quot;Long*&quot; will match
&quot;longer&quot;, &quot;longest&quot; and &quot;long&quot;. If one of
the answers is just &quot;*&quot; (a single *) this anwser will match
<p>The asterisk (*) character can be used in answers as a &quot;wild card&quot;
character. It stands for any number of characters (including no characters
at all). For example, the answer &quot;Long*&quot; will match
&quot;longer&quot;, &quot;longest&quot; and &quot;long&quot;. If one of
the answers is just &quot;*&quot; (a single *) this answer will match
anything, it is normally used as the last &quot;catch-all&quot; answer. The
matching process goes through the answers in the order they appear on the
screen. Once a match is found the process stops and the corresponding
result (and response, if present) is returned. So, if for example the
answers are Longest, Long* and * (in that order), the input
&quot;longer&quot; will match the second answer and, in this case, the
matching process goes through the answers in the order they appear on the
screen. Once a match is found the process stops and the corresponding
result (and response, if present) is returned. So, if for example the
answers are Longest, Long* and * (in that order), the input
&quot;longer&quot; will match the second answer and, in this case, the
third answer, although a match, is ignored.</p>
<p> If an asterix (*) is actually needed in an answer, it should be entered as
\*, backslash asterix.</p></li>
<p> If an asterisk (*) is actually needed in an answer, it should be entered as
\*, backslash asterisk.</p></li>
<li><p><b>True/False</b> The answer to this type of question only has two options,
true or false. The student is prompted to choose which is the correct
true or false. The student is prompted to choose which is the correct
option. This type of question is basically a Multichoice question with just
two choices.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Matching</b> These are quite powerful and flexible questions. They
consist of a list of names or statements which must be correctly matched
against other list of names or statements. For example &quot;Match the
consist of a list of names or statements which must be correctly matched
against other list of names or statements. For example &quot;Match the
Capital with the Country&quot; with the two lists Japan, Canada, Italy and
Tokyo, Ottawa, Rome. It is possible to have repeated entries in one of the
lists but care should be taken to make the repeats identical. For example
&quot;Identify the type of these creatures&quot; with the lists Sparrow,
lists but care should be taken to make the repeats identical. For example
&quot;Identify the type of these creatures&quot; with the lists Sparrow,
Cow, Ant, Dog and Bird, Animal, Insect, Animal. </p>
<p>When creating this type of question the items for the first list go into the
Answer boxes and items for the second list go into the Response boxes. Once
created a more sensible labelling scheme is shown. When the student
successfully matches the items the jump on the first answer is used. An
unsuccess answer jumps to the page on the second answer. The question does
<b>not</b> support custom responses, the student is told how many matches
Answer boxes and items for the second list go into the Response boxes. Once
created a more sensible labeling scheme is shown. When the student
successfully matches the items the jump on the first answer is used. An
unsuccessful answer jumps to the page on the second answer. The question does
<b>not</b> support custom responses, the student is told how many matches
are correct or if all the matches are correct.</p>
<p>Unlike the Multichoice question where the choices are shown in a random
<p>Unlike the Multichoice question where the choices are shown in a random
order, the first list of items is <b>not</b> shuffled but shown in the same
order as entered. This allows for <b>&quot;Ordered&quot;</b> questions to be
constructed. Consider the question &quot; Put the following into the order
they were born, the earliest first&quot; with the lists 1., 2., 3., 4. and
Longfellow, Lawrence, Lowell, Larkin. The second list is shuffed before
constructed. Consider the question &quot; Put the following into the order
they were born, the earliest first&quot; with the lists 1., 2., 3., 4. and
Longfellow, Lawrence, Lowell, Larkin. The second list is shuffed before
being used in the question, of course.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Numerical</b> This type of question requires a number as the answer.
In it's simplest form it requires just one answer to be specified. For
example &quot;What is 2 plus 2?&quot; with the answer 4 given a forward
<li><p><b>Numerical</b> This type of question requires a number as the answer.
In it's simplest form it requires just one answer to be specified. For
example &quot;What is 2 plus 2?&quot; with the answer 4 given a forward
jump. However, it is better to specify a range because the internal rounding
of numerical values can make single numeric comparisons rather hit or miss.
of numerical values can make single numeric comparisons rather hit or miss.
Thus, if the question were &quot;What is 10 divided by 3&quot; it would be
necessary to give the answer as <b>&quot;Minimum:Maximum&quot;</b>, that
is <b>two</b> values separated by a colon (:). Thus if 3.33:3.34 is given as the
acceptible range for the answer, then the answers 3.33, 3.333, 3.3333...
would all be taken as correct answers. &quot;Wrong&quot; answers would
necessary to give the answer as <b>&quot;Minimum:Maximum&quot;</b>, that
is <b>two</b> values separated by a colon (:). Thus if 3.33:3.34 is given as the
acceptable range for the answer, then the answers 3.33, 3.333, 3.3333...
would all be taken as correct answers. &quot;Wrong&quot; answers would
include 3.3 (less than the minimum) and 3.4 (greater than the maximum).</p>
<p>More than one correct answer is allowed and the answers can be either single
or pair of values. Note that the order in which the answers are tested is
Answer 1, Answer 2... so some care needs to taken if the desired response
is to appear. For example the question &quot;When was Larkin born?&quot;
could have the single value of 1922, the exact answer, and the pair of
values 1920:1929, the 20's, as the less exact answer.The order in which
these values should be tested is, obviously, 1922 then 1920:1929. The
first answer might have the response &quot;That's exactly right&quot;
while the other answer's response might be &quot;That's close, you've got
or pair of values. Note that the order in which the answers are tested is
Answer 1, Answer 2... so some care needs to taken if the desired response
is to appear. For example the question &quot;When was Larkin born?&quot;
could have the single value of 1922, the exact answer, and the pair of
values 1920:1929, the 20's, as the less exact answer.The order in which
these values should be tested is, obviously, 1922 then 1920:1929. The
first answer might have the response &quot;That's exactly right&quot;
while the other answer's response might be &quot;That's close, you've got
the right decade&quot;</p>
<p>Wrong answers can be given but depending on their actual range, care should
be taken to place them after the correct answers. For example in adding the
be taken to place them after the correct answers. For example in adding the
wrong answer 3:4 to the &quot;10 divided by 3&quot; question it needs to come
after the correct answer. That is the answers are ordered 3.33:3.34 (the
&quot;correct&quot; answer) then 3:4 (the &quot;wrong&quot; answer, but
after the correct answer. That is the answers are ordered 3.33:3.34 (the
&quot;correct&quot; answer) then 3:4 (the &quot;wrong&quot; answer, but
not wildly wrong answer!).</p></li>
</ul>
+7 -7
View File
@@ -2,18 +2,18 @@
<p>This setting determines whether the students can take the lesson more than once
or only once. The teacher may decide that the lesson contains material which
the students ought to know throughly. In which case repeated viewings of the
the students ought to know thoroughly. In which case repeated viewing of the
lesson should be allowed. If, however, the material is used more like an exam
then the students should not be allowed to re-take the lesson.</p>
<p>When the students are allowed to re-take the lesson, the <b>grades</b> shown
in the Grades page are either their <b>average</b> grade over the re-takes
or their <b>best</b> grade for the lesson. The next parameter determines
<p>When the students are allowed to re-take the lesson, the <b>grades</b> shown
in the Grades page are either their <b>average</b> grade over the re-takes
or their <b>best</b> grade for the lesson. The next parameter determines
which of these two grading alternatives is used.</p>
<p>Note that the <b>Question Analysis</b> always uses the answers from the
<p>Note that the <b>Question Analysis</b> always uses the answers from the
first tries of the lesson, subsequent re-takes by students are ignored.</p>
<p>By default this option is <b>Yes</b>, meaning that students are allowed to
<p>By default this option is <b>Yes</b>, meaning that students are allowed to
re-take the lesson. It is expected that only in exceptional circumstances
will this option be set to <b>No</b>.</p>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<p align="center"><b>Survey response type</b></p>
<p>
You can display your users' full names with each response by setting this to "fullname".<br />
You can hide your users' identities from the respones by setting this to "anonymous".
You can hide your users' identities from the responses by setting this to "anonymous".
</p>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ In the question text input and "Correct Answer Formula" {a} and {b} can be seen.
abs, acos, acosh, asin, asinh, atan, atanh, ceil, cos, cosh, deg2rad, exp, expm1, floor, log, log10, log1p, rad2deg, round, sin, sinh, sprt, tan, tanh
</b><br />and two two-argument functions<br /><b>
atan2, pow
</b><br />and the functions <b>min</b> and <b>max</b> that can take two or more arguments. It is also possible to use the function <b>pi</b> that takes no arguments but do not forget the use the parentheses - the correct usage is <b>pi()</b>. Similary the other function must have their argument(s) within parentheses. Possible usage is for example <b>sin({a}) + cos({b}) * 2</b>. It should not be any problem to wrap functions within eachother like <b>cos(deg2rad({a} + 90))</b> etc.
</b><br />and the functions <b>min</b> and <b>max</b> that can take two or more arguments. It is also possible to use the function <b>pi</b> that takes no arguments but do not forget the use the parentheses - the correct usage is <b>pi()</b>. Similarly the other function must have their argument(s) within parentheses. Possible usage is for example <b>sin({a}) + cos({b}) * 2</b>. It should not be any problem to wrap functions within each other like <b>cos(deg2rad({a} + 90))</b> etc.
<br />More details on how to use these PHP-style functions can be found in the <a target="phpmathdoc" href="http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.math.php">documentation at the PHP web site</a>
<br /><br />
As for numerical questions it is possible to allow a margin within which all responses are accepted as correct. The "Tolerance" field is used for this. However, there are three different types of tolerances. These are <b>Relative, Nominal and Geometric</b>. If we say that the correct answer at quiz time is calculated to 200 and the tolerance is set to 0.5 then the different tolerance types work like this:
<br /><br /><b>Relative:</b> A tolerance interval is calculated by multiplying the correct answer with 0.5, ie in this case we get 100 so for this tolerance the correct response must be between 100 and 300. (200 ± 100)<br />
This is useful if the magnitude of the correct answer can differ greatly between different wildcard values.
<br /><br /><b>Nominal:</b> This is the simpliest tolerance type but not very powerful. The correct response must be between 199.5 and 200.5 (200 ± 0.5)<br />
<br /><br /><b>Nominal:</b> This is the simplest tolerance type but not very powerful. The correct response must be between 199.5 and 200.5 (200 ± 0.5)<br />
This tolerance type can be useful if the differences between different correct answers are small.
<br /><br /><b>Geometric:</b> The upper limit of the tolerance interval is calculated as 200 + 0.5*200 and is the same as for the relative case. The lower limit is calculated as 200/(1 + 0.5). The correct response must then be between 133.33 and 300.<br />
This is useful for complex calculation that must have great tolerances where relative tolerances of 1 or more would be used for the upper limit but clearly not acceptable for the lower limit as it would make zero a correct answer for all cases.
+4 -4
View File
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
<p>Each category consists of a name and a short description.</p>
<p>Each category can also be "published", which means
that the category (and all questions in it) will be
available to all courses on this server, so that
<p>Each category can also be "published", which means
that the category (and all questions in it) will be
available to all courses on this server, so that
other courses can use your questions in their quizzes.</p>
<p>Categories can also be created or deleted at will.
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
questions, then you will be asked to specify another
category to move them to.</p>
<p>You can also arrange the categories in a heirarchy so
<p>You can also arrange the categories in a hierarchy so
that they are easier to manage. The 'Move category to'
field lets you move a category to another category.</p>
+29 -29
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
<p align="center"><b>Importing "Course Test Manager" files</b></p>
<p>Course Test Manager is an "End of Lifetime" software package from Course Technology.
It is no longer being actively developed by Course Technology. It has been replaced by
<p>Course Test Manager is an "End of Lifetime" software package from Course Technology.
It is no longer being actively developed by Course Technology. It has been replaced by
a new test manager called ExamView. However, there has never been a migration path to allow
this format to be exported from CTM testbanks to any other common test format. This is why this
this format to be exported from CTM test banks to any other common test format. This is why this
module has been written.</p>
<p> In order to import questions from CTM, you must have CTM installed on a Windows machine, and
<p> In order to import questions from CTM, you must have CTM installed on a Windows machine, and
have access to the MS Access data files on that machine. Two data files are required in order to
access the data files:</p>
<ul><li>System.mda - This file is in the top directory of your CTM installation, and is referred to
in MS access parlance as the "System Database".</li>
<li>ctm.mdb - this is the database that contains the test bank questions. There is one of these databases
for each course installed in CTM. It is located in a directory one level bellow your CTM installation
for each course installed in CTM. It is located in a directory one level bellow your CTM installation
directory.</li>
</ul>
</p>The import process is somewhat different based on whether you're running moodle on Windows or Linux.
Regardless of what platfom moodle is running on, you must have a Windows system (Windows 2000 or Windows XP)
</p>The import process is somewhat different based on whether you're running moodle on Windows or Linux.
Regardless of what platform moodle is running on, you must have a Windows system (Windows 2000 or Windows XP)
on the same network as your moodle system in order to host the Access database while importing test banks.</p>
<p>The process is somewhat easier on a <b>Windows-based</b> moodle system. All you need to do to use the CTM import
@@ -25,59 +25,59 @@ class is:</p>
<ol><li>upload the system.mda system database to moodle using the file manager. It doesn't matter what course you
upload the system.mda file to. Moodle will find it regardless.</li>
<li>Crete your quiz and go into the "import questions from file" process. Upload your chosen ctm.mdb
database as the file to import. If you did this correctly, you will see another screen that allows you
to choose the sub-category of questions to import from the database. The reason this step is here is that
CTM test banks often contain a large number of categorized questions, based on the chapters of the book or
<li>Crete your quiz and go into the "import questions from file" process. Upload your chosen ctm.mdb
database as the file to import. If you did this correctly, you will see another screen that allows you
to choose the sub-category of questions to import from the database. The reason this step is here is that
CTM test banks often contain a large number of categorized questions, based on the chapters of the book or
sections of the course.</li>
</ol>
<p>The process on a <b>Linux-based</b> moodle system includes a third-party software component called the
<a href="http://odbcsock.sourceforge.net/" target="_new"><b>ODBC Socket Server</b></a>. In order to import CTM databases on Linux, you must first download and install
this small network program on the Windows system that hosts your CTM databases. <b>Do not</b> follow the installation
steps outlined in the ODBC Socket Server Installation. They're more complicated than they need to be!
steps outlined in the ODBC Socket Server Installation. They're more complicated than they need to be!
Instead, follow these steps to install this program on your Windows system:</p>
<ol><li>Go to the windows system and unzip the install file you downloaded from
<ol><li>Go to the windows system and unzip the install file you downloaded from
<a href="http://odbcsock.sourceforge.net/" target="_new">this site</a> on the system.</li>
<li>Copy the binary ODBCSocketServer.exe to a permanent location, such as your system directory
(probably C:\WINNT\ or C:\Windows) or your Program Files directory. </li>
<li>Copy the binary ODBCSocketServer.exe to a permanent location, such as your system directory
(probably C:\WINNT\ or C:\Windows) or your Program Files directory. </li>
<li>Install the ODBC Socket Server as a Service on the system with this command:<br />
<b>&lt;path you copied the file to in the step above&gt;ODBCSocketServer.exe /Service</b><br />
You may do this by typing this command from Start-&gt;Run... dialog, or from a command prompt.</li>
<li>Open the Service Manager by either going to
<li>Open the Service Manager by either going to
Start-&gt;Settings-&gt;Control Panels-&gt;Administrative Tools-&gt;Services or by right-clicking on
<b>My Computer</b>, choosing <b>Manage</b>, then choosing <b>Services and Applications-&gt;Services</b> from
the right panel. You may also access the Service manager by typing <b>services.msc</b> in the Start-&gt;Run...
<b>My Computer</b>, choosing <b>Manage</b>, then choosing <b>Services and Applications-&gt;Services</b> from
the right panel. You may also access the Service manager by typing <b>services.msc</b> in the Start-&gt;Run...
dialog</li>
<li>In the Service manager, right-click the ODBC Socket Server item and choose the <b>Start</b> item. It's status
<li>In the Service manager, right-click the ODBC Socket Server item and choose the <b>Start</b> item. It's status
should change to "started" when you do this. Note that you may stop and/or disable this service completely after
you've completed the import process.</li>
<li>Make sure that the system.mda and ctm.mdb access data files are on the machine,
<li>Make sure that the system.mda and ctm.mdb access data files are on the machine,
and that the MS Access ODBC driver is present. It is installed in a standard Windows installation. You can
determine if it installed by opening the "Data Sources" item in "Administrative Tools" and referring to the "Drivers"
tab. You're going to have to determine where CTM is installed and locate the system.mda file and the ctm.mdb database
or databases you're interested in importing data from. Make note of the full local paths to these files as well
tab. You're going to have to determine where CTM is installed and locate the system.mda file and the ctm.mdb database
or databases you're interested in importing data from. Make note of the full local paths to these files as well
as the IP address or hostname of the Windows server. You're going to need this information for the import process.</li>
<li>Now you may import the testbank or testbanks into moodle. Crete your quiz and go into the
<li>Now you may import the testbank or testbanks into moodle. Crete your quiz and go into the
"import questions from file" process. <b>NOW HERE'S WHERE THINGS ARE DIFFERENT FOR LINUX - </b>
YOU MUST SPECIFY A DUMMY FILE IN THE UPLOAD FIELD TO GET THE IMPORT PROCESS STARTED. THIS FILE <b>WILL NOT</b>
BE PROCESSED, IT'S JUST A PLACEHOLDER FOR THE IMPORT FORM. YOU WILL GET A PLACE TO SPECIFY THE WINDOWS SERVER
INFORMATION NEXT. Next, you will get a screen where you can type in the hostname for the Windows ODBC Socket Server
machine as well as the paths to the system and testbank databases. Type in the information you wrote down from the
machine as well as the paths to the system and testbank databases. Type in the information you wrote down from the
previous step here and click "Connect to Server". If everything was set up correctly, you'll get another form to allow
you to choose the sub-category of questions to import from the database. The reason this step is here is that
CTM test banks often contain a large number of categorized questions, based on the chapters of the book or
you to choose the sub-category of questions to import from the database. The reason this step is here is that
CTM test banks often contain a large number of categorized questions, based on the chapters of the book or
sections of the course. IF YOU GET TO THIS STEP WITHOUT ERROR MESSAGES, YOU HAVE SET UP THE SOCKET SERVER CORRECTLY
AND YOU'RE ABOUT TO IMPORT QUESTIONS TO MOODLE!</li>
</ol>
<p>If you received error messages during this process, you may find this technical information useful.
The ODBC Socket server uses port 9628 to open a socket and trade and XML query for an XML result table of
the query results. The import class parses that XML and use it just like I use a local query to do the importing.
<p>If you received error messages during this process, you may find this technical information useful.
The ODBC Socket server uses port 9628 to open a socket and trade and XML query for an XML result table of
the query results. The import class parses that XML and use it just like I use a local query to do the importing.
</p>
+3 -3
View File
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
<p>The WebCT import filter is in development and does not support
all of the WebCT question types.</p>
<p>At the time of writing this, only Multiple Choice and Short answer
<p>At the time of writing this, only Multiple Choice and Short answer
questions are supported.</p>
<p>Here are some examples of these questions in a text file:</p>
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
:TITLE:Short Answer Question
:QUESTION:H
What is the name of the WebCT Learning Hub?
&lt;br />
&lt;br />
:IMAGE:dotcomLogoc.gif
:ANSWERS:1
:CASE:0
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Be sure to visit the Learning Hub\: www.WebCT.com
:TYPE:MC:1:0:C
:TITLE:Multiple Choice Question
:FEEDBACK
Darwin invented the theory of evolution and created darwinism.
Darwin invented the theory of evolution and created Darwinism.
:QUESTION:H
Where is the Darwin Research Center?
:IMAGE:
+1 -1
View File
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=correctanswers.html">Correct answers</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=createmultiple.html">Creating multiple quizzes</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=description.html">Descriptions</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=repeatattempts.html">Each attempt buids on the last</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=repeatattempts.html">Each attempt builds on the last</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=multianswer.html">Embedded Answers (Cloze)</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=grademethod.html">Grading method</a></li>
<li><a href="help.php?module=quiz&file=import.html">Importing questions</a></li>
+8 -8
View File
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
<p align="center"><b>Embedded answers (Cloze)</b></p>
<p>This very flexible question type is similar to a
<p>This very flexible question type is similar to a
popular format known as the Cloze format. </p>
<p>Questions consist of a passage of text (in Moodle format) that
has various answers embedded within it, including multiple choice,
<p>Questions consist of a passage of text (in Moodle format) that
has various answers embedded within it, including multiple choice,
short answers and numerical answers.</p>
<p>There is currently no graphical interface to create these questions -
you need to specify the question format using the text box or by
<p>There is currently no graphical interface to create these questions -
you need to specify the question format using the text box or by
importing them from external files.</p>
<p>Here is an example of the input text used to specify such a question:</p>
<form>
<center>
<textarea rows="15" cols="60" wrap="virtual">This question consists of some text with an answer embedded right here {1:MULTICHOICE:Wrong answer#Feedback for this wrong answer~Another wrong answer#Feedback for the other wrong answer~=Correct answer#Feedback for correct answer~%50%Answer that gives half the credit#Feedback for half credit answer} and right after that you will have to deal with this short answer {1:SHORTANSWER:Wrong answer#Feedback for this wrong answer~=Correct answer#Feedback for correct answer~%50%Answer that gives half the credit#Feedback for half credit answer} and finally we have a floating point number {2:NUMERICAL:=23.8:0.1#Feedback for correct answer 23.8~%50%N/A#Feedback for halfcredit answer in the nearby region of the correct answer}.
<textarea rows="15" cols="60" wrap="virtual">This question consists of some text with an answer embedded right here {1:MULTICHOICE:Wrong answer#Feedback for this wrong answer~Another wrong answer#Feedback for the other wrong answer~=Correct answer#Feedback for correct answer~%50%Answer that gives half the credit#Feedback for half credit answer} and right after that you will have to deal with this short answer {1:SHORTANSWER:Wrong answer#Feedback for this wrong answer~=Correct answer#Feedback for correct answer~%50%Answer that gives half the credit#Feedback for half credit answer} and finally we have a floating point number {2:NUMERICAL:=23.8:0.1#Feedback for correct answer 23.8~%50%N/A#Feedback for half credit answer in the nearby region of the correct answer}.
Note that addresses like www.moodle.org and smileys :-) all work as normal:
a) How good is this? {:MULTICHOICE:=Yes#Correct~No#We have a different opinion}
+5 -5
View File
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
<p align="center"><b>Random Short-Answer Matching questions</b></p>
<p>After an optional introduction, the respondent is presented with
several sub-questions and several jumbled answers. There is one
<p>After an optional introduction, the respondent is presented with
several sub-questions and several jumbled answers. There is one
correct answer for each question.</p>
<p>The respondent must select an answer to match each sub-question.</p>
<p>Each sub-question is equally weighted to contibute towards the
<p>Each sub-question is equally weighted to contribute towards the
grade for the total question.</p>
<p>The questions and answers are randomly drawn from the pool of
<p>The questions and answers are randomly drawn from the pool of
"Short Answer" questions in the current category. Each attempt
on a quiz will have different questions and answers.</p>
+7 -7
View File
@@ -2,22 +2,22 @@
<p>This field is optional.</p>
<p>You can restrict access for a quiz to particular subnets
on the LAN or Internet by specifying a comma-separated list of
<p>You can restrict access for a quiz to particular subnets
on the LAN or Internet by specifying a comma-separated list of
partial or full IP address numbers.</p>
<p>This is especially useful for a proctored quiz, where you want
to be sure that only people in a certain room are able to
<p>This is especially useful for a proctodea quiz, where you want
to be sure that only people in a certain room are able to
access the quiz.</p>
<p>For example: <b>192.168. , 231.54.211.0/20, 231.3.56.211</b></p>
<p>There are three types of numbers you can use (you can not use
<p>There are three types of numbers you can use (you can not use
text based domain names like example.com):
<ol>
<li>Full IP addresses, such as <b>192.168.10.1</b> which will match
<li>Full IP addresses, such as <b>192.168.10.1</b> which will match
a single computer (or proxy).</li>
<li>Partial addresses, such as <b>192.168</b> which will match anything
<li>Partial addresses, such as <b>192.168</b> which will match anything
starting with those numbers.</li>
<li>CIDR notation, such as <b>231.54.211.0/20</b> which allows you to specify
more detailed subnets.</li>
+5 -5
View File
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
<p align="center"><b>Short Answer questions</b></p>
<p>In response to a question (that may include a image) the respondent
<p>In response to a question (that may include a image) the respondent
types a word or short phrase.</p>
<p>There may be several possible correct answers, each with a different
grade. If the "Case sensitive" option is selected, then you can
<p>There may be several possible correct answers, each with a different
grade. If the "Case sensitive" option is selected, then you can
have different scores for "Word" or "word".</p>
<p>You can use the asterix character (*) as a <b>wildcard</b> to match
<p>You can use the asterisk character (*) as a <b>wildcard</b> to match
any series of characters. For example, use ran*ing to match any word
or phrase starting with "ran" and ending with "ing". If you really
or phrase starting with "ran" and ending with "ing". If you really
do want to match an asterisk then use a backslash like this: \*</p>
<p>Without wildcards the answers are compared exactly, so be careful with your spelling!</p>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
<p align="center"><strong>Time limit</strong></p>
<p>By default, quizzes do not have a time limit, which allows
<p>By default, quizzes do not have a time limit, which allows
students as much time as they need to complete the quiz.</p>
<p>If you do specify a time limit, the several things are done to try and
ensure that quizzes are completed within that time:</p>
<ul>
<li>Javascript support in the brower becomes mandatory - this allows
<li>Javascript support in the browser becomes mandatory - this allows
the timer to work correctly.</li>
<li>A floating timer window is shown with a countdown</li>
<li>When the timer has run out, the quiz is submitted automatically
+11 -11
View File
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
<p align="center"><b>Window settings</b></p>
<p>These settings can be hidden/shown by clicking the button labelled Hide settings or Show settings.</p>
<p>These settings can be hidden/shown by clicking the button labeled Hide settings or Show settings.</p>
<p>Usually, resources are displayed in a normal framed window with the Moodle navigation
controls in the top frame. If you choose, you can remove this frame and have the
<p>Usually, resources are displayed in a normal framed window with the Moodle navigation
controls in the top frame. If you choose, you can remove this frame and have the
resource fill the window like a normal web page.</p>
<p>However, if you wish to have your resource appear in a new popup window follow these steps:</p>
@@ -15,25 +15,25 @@
<blockquote>
<b>Allow the window to be resized?</b>
<p>
Keeping this item selected will allow users to change the size of the window that you have defined,
and should almost always be left selected. However, sometimes the resource is a fixed size and
Keeping this item selected will allow users to change the size of the window that you have defined,
and should almost always be left selected. However, sometimes the resource is a fixed size and
it may make sense to lock the window size.</p>
<b>Allow the window to be scrolled?</b>
<p>
This item will allow users to scroll through the window to see all your resource.
If this item is unchecked, users will only see what what fits in the defined window size and will not
This item will allow users to scroll through the window to see all your resource.
If this item is unchecked, users will only see what fits in the defined window size and will not
be allowed to scroll the window to see the rest of the resource.</p>
<b>Show the directory links?</b>
<p>This will allow users to see the their directory links in this window. This varies per browser: it might be
<p>This will allow users to see the their directory links in this window. This varies per browser: it might be
known as the Links Bar (in IE), the Favourites Bar or the Bookmarks bar (in Mozilla/Firefox).</p>
<b>Show the location bar?</b>
<p>Do you want your users to see the URL (Web address) of the resource? If so, leave this option checked. Otherwise, the resource location will be hidden.</p>
<b>Show the menu bar?</b>
<p>To let your users have access to the menu bar in this window, leave this item checked. Generally this is
<p>To let your users have access to the menu bar in this window, leave this item checked. Generally this is
useful but for some graphical presentations it looks better without a menu bar.</p>
<b>Show the toolbar?</b>
@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@
<li>Determine the size window you wish to open. <br />
<blockquote>
<p>Many people still use an average screen resolution of 800x600. In most cases it's best if you
<p>Many people still use an average screen resolution of 800x600. In most cases it's best if you
initially size your window a little smaller than that, like 600 high and 480 wide.</p>
<p>If you leave these fields blank then the new popup window will be exactly the same size as the window they
<p>If you leave these fields blank then the new popup window will be exactly the same size as the window they
clicked on to get the popup.</p>
</blockquote>
+12 -206
View File
@@ -1,310 +1,116 @@
<p align="center"><b>Writing pages using Wiki-like formatting</b></p>
<p>
Wiki formatted pages provide a facility for marking up plain text with intuitive, human readable
formatting that will be converted to XHTML when displayed. The big advantages are that you
formatting that will be converted to XHTML when displayed. The big advantages are that you
do not need to learn HTML to produce quite complex results, and that the text you write
<em>looks</em> good to the eye even <em>before</em> conversion. It is a real alternative to
<em>looks</em> good to the eye even <em>before</em> conversion. It is a real alternative to
saving Word files as HTML retaining the ability to edit the resource online.
</p>
<p>You should enter basically plain text. There are a number of <em>special</em> characters you
can add to insert formatting</p>
<h3>Block level formatting</h3>
<p>
Paragraph blocks are separated by at least one blank line. To add special formatting to a paragraph
add one of the following special characters in the first character of the first line of the block followed
by a space...
</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Character</th><th>Block Type</th></tr>
<tr><td>No character</td><td>Ordinary paragraph</td></tr>
<tr><td>&gt;</td><td>Quotation</td></tr>
<tr><td>Space</td><td>Preformatted Text (Monospaced)</td></tr>
<tr><td>%</td><td>Preformatted <em>and</em> Wikki formatting is ignored</td></tr>
<tr><td>%</td><td>Preformatted <em>and</em> Wiki formatting is ignored</td></tr>
<tr><td>!#</td><td>Heading - where # is 1-6, the heading level (1 is biggest)</td></tr>
<tr><td>Q.</td><td>Question - styling info added to paragraph to improve question/answer presentation (in theme)</td></tr>
<tr><td>A.</td><td>Answer - as above but answer</td></tr>
</table>
<h3>List Formatting</h3>
<p>Simple lists can be constructed easily by placing a special character at the start of each line in the list followed by a space.
The list is terminated by a blank line. Lists may be freely nested - and nested lists may change list type. Definition list
definitions and text types may be freely intermixed to obtain the desired effect. The special characters
are as follows...</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Character</th><th>List item type</th></tr>
<tr><td>*</td><td>Unordered List (bullet points)</td></tr>
<tr><td>#</td><td>Ordered List (1,2,3 etc)</td></tr>
<tr><td>:</td><td>Definition list, definition</td></tr>
<tr><td>;</td><td>Definition list, text</td></tr>
</table>
</table>
<p>Nested lists example:</p>
<p><pre>
* First Bullet
* Second Bullet
## nested line 1
## nested line 2
* Third Bullet
</pre></p>
<p>Produces:
<ul><li>First Bullet</li>
<li>Second Bullet</li>
<ol><li>nested line 1</li>
<li>nested line 2</li></ol>
<li>Third Bullet
</ul></p>
<h3>Inline formatting</h3>
<p>Inline formmating allows part of a line to be marked as having a particular style. The special
<p>Inline formatting allows part of a line to be marked as having a particular style. The special
characters used can appear anywhere on a line, but note that the formatting cannot
cross lines. Codes are as follows...</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Example</th><th>Example</th><th>Formatting</th></tr>
<tr><td>*hello world*</td><td><strong>hello world</strong></td><td>Strong or Bold</td></tr>
<tr><td>/hello world/</td><td><em>hello world</em></td><td>Emphasis or Italics</td></tr>
<tr><td>+hello world+</td><td><ins>hello world</ins></td><td>Inserted text</td></tr>
<tr><td>-hello world-</td><td><del>hello world</del></td><td>Deleted or Strikethrough</td></tr>
<tr><td>hello ~world~</td><td>hello <sub>world</sub></td><td>Subscript</td></tr>
<tr><td>hello ^world^</td><td>hello <sup>world</sup></td><td>Superscript</td></tr>
<tr><td>"hello world"</td><td>&#8220;hello world&#8221;</td><td>Quoted</td></tr>
<tr><td>%hello world%</td><td><code>hello world</code></td><td>Code or Monospaced</td></tr>
<tr><td>@hello world@</td><td><cite>hello world</cite></td><td>Cite</td></tr>
</table>
</table>
<h3>Acronyms</h3>
<p>Acronym tagging is acheived by placing the acronym in capital letters followed by the description
<p>Acronym tagging is achieved by placing the acronym in capital letters followed by the description
is parenthesis. There must be no space between the acronym and the parenthesis. Example...</p>
<p>HTML(Hypertext Markup Language) <br /> <acronym title="Hypertext Markup Language">HTML</acronym></p>
<h3>Hyper Links</h3>
<p>Links can be placed in the text and are followed (with no spaces) by the text to be displayed in brackets. Example: </em>http://www.google.com/(Search Now)</em> will be converted to
<p>Links can be placed in the text and are followed (with no spaces) by the text to be displayed in brackets. Example: </em>http://www.google.com/(Search Now)</em> will be converted to
<a href="http://www.google.com/">Search Now</a>.</p>
<p>Mail links can be acheived the same way, e.g.,</p>
<p>Mail links can be achieved the same way, e.g.,</p>
<p>[email protected](Test User) will be converted to
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Test User</a></p>
<h3>Moodle Module Links</h3>
<p>If you know the Moodle id number (look for ?id=nn at the end of a module address) and
<p>If you know the Moodle id number (look for ?id=nn at the end of a module address) and
the module name, you can link directly to that resource using the syntax:</p>
<p>ModuleName:nn(Description Text)</p>
<p>eg, <em>resource:36(My New Page)</em> <em>forum:10(Jump to forum)</em></p>
<h3>Moodle Picture Links</h3>
<p>Inline graphics can be placed on wiki pages. You need to upload the graphic and note its path within the file upload area. The syntax is:</p>
<p>/<em>..path to file..</em>(alt text)</p>
<p>for example, /mypics/graphic.jpg(Staff picture)</p>
<h3>Moodle File Links</h3>
<p>Very like Picture Links (above), this feature enables links to previously uploaded
files to be placed in a wiki page. The syntax is:</p>
<p><b>file:</b><em>..path to file</em>(link text)</p>
<p>for example, file:/pdfs/moodle.pdf(Information About Moodle)</p>
<h3>Automatic reformating</h3>
<h3>Automatic reformatting</h3>
<p>Many commonly used functions are converted into their XHTML equivalents automatically.. The main ones are as
follows...</p>
<ul>
<li>HTTP links are converted into active links</li>
<li> ..., (R), (TM), (C), 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 are all converted to the correct character</li>
<li> digits x digits converts to correct multiply symbol</li>
<li>A line starting with at least four dashes is converted into a horizontal line</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<h3>Spelling Checker (Experimental)</h3>
<p>The wiki formatter can be switched into a spell checking mode. Place the following on
a line by itself in the text. Everything after this will be checked...</p>
<pre>
!SPELL:language_code:language_variant
Examples:
!SPELL:en:british
!SPELL:sp
</pre>
<p>"language_code" should be replaced by the appropriate code (e.g., EN, FR etc), "language_variant" (along with the colon) is optional and can be one of "american", "british", or "canadian" if the language code is EN.</p>
<p>When displayed any unknown words are highlighted and you can see suggestions by holding the mouse over
the word</p>
<p><em>NOTE: spelling uses the <strong>pspell</strong> libraries. These and the required dictionaries must be present on your server for the spell checker to work. In particular the Windows platform is not supported.
</em></p>
+4 -4
View File
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Moodle's wiki is based on
<a href="http://erfurtwiki.sourceforge.net/?id=ErfurtWiki" target="_blank">ErfurtWiki</a>,
which is an implementation of the
which is an implementation of the
<a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiWikiWeb" target="_blank">WikiWikiWeb</a>
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ hypertext system. It allows simple collaborative editing and creation of web pag
<li>just click on <img alt src="pix/t/edit.gif"> or select "Edit this page" from the drop down menu to change the contents of a page</li>
<li>you can format your pages wth <a href="#wikimarkup">Wiki Markup</a>, or with HTML (if the wiki has been given that option)</li>
<li>you can format your pages with <a href="#wikimarkup">Wiki Markup</a>, or with HTML (if the wiki has been given that option)</li>
<li>SearchPages or go to the list of NewestPages</li>
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Each page inside a Wiki can be edited easily, using wiki markup.
<li> or, enclose some <b>words in square brackets</b> to create a HyperLink</li>
<li> any valid internet address (starting with <a href="http://">http://</a>) like http://www.example.com/ inside the text will be made clickable automagically</li>
<li> any valid internet address (starting with <a href="http://">http://</a>) like http://www.example.com/ inside the text will be made clickable automatically</li>
<li> enclose a www address or a WikiLink inside square brackets [<a href="http://www.moodle.org/">Moodle</a>] and assign it a neat title using quotation marks or the | character
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ This linking scheme is often also called BumpyText.</p>
<p>
While language purists hate Wikis for that naming scheme, it is very common in the
While language purists hate Wikis for that naming scheme, it is very common in the
computing world and well known to most programmers.</p>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
<tr><td valign="top" width="25%">OFF</td><td>The page is disabled.</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top" width="25%">HTM</td><td>Allow HTML for this page (the general Wiki setting precedes this flag).</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top" width="25%">RO</td><td>Read Only.</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top" width="25%">WR</td><td>Writeable.</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top" width="25%">WR</td><td>Writable.</td></tr>
</table>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Wiki is a platform for working together on constructing web pages. The principle
<ul>
<li>A text is written and saved.</li>
<li>Later, another person may read that text and think of some additions or
<li>Later, another person may read that text and think of some additions or
corrections that could be made. They choose "Edit" and make their changes to the page. </li>
<li>After saving their new version, it is available globally.</li><br /> <br />
</ul>
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Wiki formatting rules</b></p>
<li> just enter a WikiWord inside your text to create a new hyper link</li>
<li> enclose some words in [square brackets] to create a HyperLink inside the WikiWikiWeb which is not made up of a valid WikiWord</li>
<li> any valid internet address (starting with http:/) like http://www.example.com/ inside the text will be made clickable automagically</li>
<li> any valid internet address (starting with http:/) like http://www.example.com/ inside the text will be made clickable automatically</li>
<li> enclose a www address or a WikiLink inside square brackets and assign it a neat title using quotation marks or the | character
<ul>
<li> [title | http://example.com]</li>
+12 -12
View File
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
<p>Comments can be added to an assessment to:
<ol>
<li>Add additional explaination or clarification to the assessment (by
the student who assessed the piece of work);</li>
<li>Query the statements made in the assessment (by the student whose
piece of work is being assessed;</li>
<li>Add additional explanation or clarification to the assessment (by
the student who assessed the piece of work);</li>
<li>Query the statements made in the assessment (by the student whose
piece of work is being assessed;</li>
<li>Try to resolve difficulties which may have arisen during the discussion
on the assessment (by the teacher);</li>
on the assessment (by the teacher);</li>
</ol>
<p>The aim of the comments is to try either reach agreement on the
current assessment or persuade the assessor to revise their assessment.
This discussion should be undertaken in a reasonable way. </p>
<p>If the work is reassessed then the old comments are discarded and
are no longer shown with the new assessment.
<p>The aim of the comments is to try either reach agreement on the
current assessment or persuade the assessor to revise their assessment.
This discussion should be undertaken in a reasonable way. </p>
<p>If the work is reassessed then the old comments are discarded and
are no longer shown with the new assessment.
</p>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<p align="center"><b>Analysis of Assessments</b></p>
<p>This analysis looks at the assessments made on the examples as well as those made during the peer assessment phase of the assignment. It attempts to select the better assessments out of this pool of teacher and student assessments. These &quot;good&quot; assesments are then used in the calculation of the final grade.
<p>This analysis looks at the assessments made on the examples as well as those made during the peer assessment phase of the assignment. It attempts to select the better assessments out of this pool of teacher and student assessments. These &quot;good&quot; assessments are then used in the calculation of the final grade.
</p>
<p>This analysis is best done when there are teacher assessments available. These assessments can act as a benchmark against which the student assessments can be judged. The teacher does <b>not</b> need to assess every example and every submission but for the analysis to be meaningful it is better to have more assessments from the teacher than the average number of assessments made by each student. And the more assessments made by the teacher the more confident the teacher can be of the results of the analysis.
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@
<ol>
<li>The Loading for Teacher Assessments sets the weighting to given the teacher's assessments compared to the students' assessments in the error analysis stage. If the teacher wants their own grading strategy to dominate the way the students grade the submissions then the teacher should be the assessor with the smallest average error in the &quot;Error Table&quot;. If the teacher is not the first one listed than the loading of the teacher's assessments is increased until the teacher has the lowest average error. This then implies that the teacher's assessments are dominate and the students who grade like the teacher are also listed in the top part of the Error Table. The students listed at the bottom part of the table are grading in ways which not match the teacher assessments (nor those of the students in the top of the table). The more assessments that are available from the teacher the more likely that this option will not have to be used to force the teacher to the top of the table. Note that this option does <b>not</b> apply a weighting factor the teacher's assessments when they used in the calculation of final grades. In that calculation the teacher assessments have the same weight as the student assessments. So for example if a student's submission is graded at 41% by the teacher and 45% and 55% by their peers the final grade given to the submission is (41% + 45% + 55%) / 3, that is 47%.</li>
<li>The Weight for Grading of Assessments is used in the calculation of the Final Grade. A simple formula is used to calculate a student's &quot;Grading Performance&quot;. It is the proportion of &quot;good&quot;assessments that student have done compared to the maximum number of assessments open to them. So, if for example, the assignment asks the students to do 3 assessments of the example submission and 5 peer assessments and the student does 7 assessments and 1 of those is dropped from the analysis (see below), then their grading performance is (7 - 1)/8, that is 75%. The final grade for the assignment a weighted combination of this grading performanace and the grade given to their submission (or best grade if they made more than one submission). The grade for the submission is always given a weight of 1. So setting this option to say, 0.5, means that the two grades are added together in the proportion 0.5:1 or 33% of the grading performance and 66% of the grade of the submission.</li>
<li>The Percentage of Assessments to drop determines the number of the assessments which are to be excluded when calculating the final grades. This number can be set in one of two ways.
<li>The Weight for Grading of Assessments is used in the calculation of the Final Grade. A simple formula is used to calculate a student's &quot;Grading Performance&quot;. It is the proportion of &quot;good&quot;assessments that student have done compared to the maximum number of assessments open to them. So, if for example, the assignment asks the students to do 3 assessments of the example submission and 5 peer assessments and the student does 7 assessments and 1 of those is dropped from the analysis (see below), then their grading performance is (7 - 1)/8, that is 75%. The final grade for the assignment a weighted combination of this grading performance and the grade given to their submission (or best grade if they made more than one submission). The grade for the submission is always given a weight of 1. So setting this option to say, 0.5, means that the two grades are added together in the proportion 0.5:1 or 33% of the grading performance and 66% of the grade of the submission.</li>
<li>The Percentage of Assessments to drop determines the number of the assessments which are to be excluded when calculating the final grades. This number can be set in one of two ways.
<ul><li>Given the way the Grading Performance is calculated each student could, if they assessed all the work allocated to them, achieve full marks (for this element) if no assessments are dropped. If the teacher wishes to have a more reason average grade then setting this option to 30% would result in the average Grading Performance of about 70% (again if all students graded all the assessments open to them).</li>
<li>Alternatively the number of assessments to drop might be set such that the remaining &quot;good&quot; assessments result in the Average Errors being constrained to some reasonable value. These are the percentages given in the fourth column of the Error Table. For example, it may be thought that all the student assessments should (on average) lie within the 20% range. Then the analysis is repeated a number of times adjusting the number of assessments to drop until the figures in this column all lie within a particular limit. </li>
</ul></li>
</ol>
<p>In addition to the Error Table the analysis lists the grades of all assessments and the final grades given to the students. This table should be inspected to see if the results are reasonable. In particular if many assessments are dropped then some submissions may left unassessed and the student's final grade will be far too small. The analysis does given the number of submissions at the top of page and again just before the Grades Table. These two numbers should be same. If there are one or more unassessed submissions and the teacher does not want to decrease the number of dropped assessments then those submissions should be assessed by the teacher and the analysis repeated. It is important that all submissions are assessed at least once in the final stage of the analysis that is when the final grades are calculated.
<p>In addition to the Error Table the analysis lists the grades of all assessments and the final grades given to the students. This table should be inspected to see if the results are reasonable. In particular if many assessments are dropped then some submissions may left unassessed and the student's final grade will be far too small. The analysis does given the number of submissions at the top of page and again just before the Grades Table. These two numbers should be same. If there are one or more unassessed submissions and the teacher does not want to decrease the number of dropped assessments then those submissions should be assessed by the teacher and the analysis repeated. It is important that all submissions are assessed at least once in the final stage of the analysis that is when the final grades are calculated.
</p>
<p>There is a balance between the number of assessments dropped and the overall final grade. The more assessments dropped the lower the final grades are likely to be. However, if poor assessments are <b>not</b> dropped then students may complain about the quality of the assessments which determine the grade for their work. Provided there are enough assessments by the teacher to dominate the analysis without too much forcing, then it would seem reasonable to drop somewhere between 15% and 30% of the assessments.
</p>
+12 -12
View File
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
<p>A peer graded assignment can have one of two types:
<ol>
<li>Only feedback on the assessment elements and the general comment
is entered. The grading of assessment elements is not seen in the
grading pages. Assignments themselves are not given an overall grade.
However, the grading performance of the students is measured and
this, and only this measure contributes towards the final grades given
to the students.</li>
<li>Only feedback on the assessment elements and the general comment
is entered. The grading of assessment elements is not seen in the
grading pages. Assignments themselves are not given an overall grade.
However, the grading performance of the students is measured and
this, and only this measure contributes towards the final grades given
to the students.</li>
<li>Here the teacher and peers are asked to provide both feedback and
grades. The assignments are given an overall quantative grade as well
as the qualative data. The final grade for a student will be calculated
from the (weighted) contributions of the teacher's grade, the mean
peers' grade and the student's grading performance.</li>
grades. The assignments are given an overall quantitative grade as well
as the qualitative data. The final grade for a student will be calculated
from the (weighted) contributions of the teacher's grade, the mean
peers' grade and the student's grading performance.</li>
</ol>
</p>
@@ -1,54 +1,54 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Calculation of the Final Grade</b></p>
<p>The table on this screen shows how the the final grades for the students
are calculated. The final grades are a weighted sum of up to five components.</p>
<p>The table on this screen shows how the final grades for the students
are calculated. The final grades are a weighted sum of up to five components.</p>
<ol>
<li>The teacher's grade for their submitted work. This is optional and will be
used if the teacher actually assesses the student's work. If the student submits
more than one piece of work the &quot;best&quot; grade is used. Here, best
means the piece of work with the highest weighted combination of teacher's
grade and peer grade...</li>
used if the teacher actually assesses the student's work. If the student submits
more than one piece of work the &quot;best&quot; grade is used. Here, best
means the piece of work with the highest weighted combination of teacher's
grade and peer grade...</li>
<li>The average of the peer grades for their submitted work. Again if the student
submits more than one piece of work the &quot;best&quot; grade is used. The
peer grade can optionally
include the teacher's grade. This grade would be included if the number of
peer gradings is very low or it is thought that the peer gradings are suspect
either because of bias (usually on the high side) or for not being reliable.
If included the teacher's grade is treated in the same way as a peer grade in
the calculation of the average.</li>
submits more than one piece of work the &quot;best&quot; grade is used. The
peer grade can optionally
include the teacher's grade. This grade would be included if the number of
peer gradings is very low or it is thought that the peer gradings are suspect
either because of bias (usually on the high side) or for not being reliable.
If included the teacher's grade is treated in the same way as a peer grade in
the calculation of the average.</li>
<li>The student's bias in grading peer work. This is measure of whether the
student grades work either too high or too low. It is not an absolute measure
as it is based on the difference between the student's grade and the peer
averages for each of the submissions they assessed. In general this component
should NOT be given a high weighting.</li>
student grades work either too high or too low. It is not an absolute measure
as it is based on the difference between the student's grade and the peer
averages for each of the submissions they assessed. In general this component
should NOT be given a high weighting.</li>
<li>The student's reliability in grading peer work. This is a measure on how well
a students grades follow the peer average for the pieces of work they
assessed. The measure discounts the student bias and averages the absolute
differences between their grades and the peer average grades. In theory if
the students gives high marks for good pieces of work and low marks for poor
pieces of work their reliability will be high. If it is suspected that the students in
general are poor assessors then the teacher's grades should be included into
the ppeer averages, this should make the reliability values more meaningful.
a students grades follow the peer average for the pieces of work they
assessed. The measure discounts the student bias and averages the absolute
differences between their grades and the peer average grades. In theory if
the students gives high marks for good pieces of work and low marks for poor
pieces of work their reliability will be high. If it is suspected that the students in
general are poor assessors then the teacher's grades should be included into
the peer averages, this should make the reliability values more meaningful.
<li>The average grade given by the teacher for the student's assessments.</li>
This includes both the preliminary assessments made by the student on the
example pieces of work and any grading the teacher makes on the asessments
produced during the peer assessement phase of the assignment. In general this
component is probably more important than both the Bias and Reliability
components and thus, if available, should be weighted higher.</li>
This includes both the preliminary assessments made by the student on the
example pieces of work and any grading the teacher makes on the assessments
produced during the peer assessment phase of the assignment. In general this
component is probably more important than both the Bias and Reliability
components and thus, if available, should be weighted higher.</li>
</ol>
<p>These five components can be weighted as deemed appropriate for the
assignment. For example the teacher's grade might be weighted strongly
if the peer grading part of the assignment is only considered a minor part
of the assignment as a whole. Alternatively, if the teacher only grades a few
of the submissions these grades can be ignored by giving them a zero weighting.
If the assignment is all about the students as judges and the providing of feedback
then first two components may be set to zero (or low) and the students'
grading abilities will determine the final grades.</p>
<p>These five components can be weighted as deemed appropriate for the
assignment. For example the teacher's grade might be weighted strongly
if the peer grading part of the assignment is only considered a minor part
of the assignment as a whole. Alternatively, if the teacher only grades a few
of the submissions these grades can be ignored by giving them a zero weighting.
If the assignment is all about the students as judges and the providing of feedback
then first two components may be set to zero (or low) and the students'
grading abilities will determine the final grades.</p>
<p>Note that this screen is used iteratively and the final grades are not normally
made available to the students until the final phase of the assignment. Once the
the teacher is happy with the final grades and their weightings then they can
be made available to the students.
made available to the students until the final phase of the assignment. Once the
the teacher is happy with the final grades and their weightings then they can
be made available to the students.
</p>
@@ -1,69 +1,69 @@
<p align="center"><b>Comparison of Assessments</b></p>
<p>In a workshop it is common for the same piece of work to be assessed by the
teacher and the students. If examples are used then the teacher first
teacher and the students. If examples are used then the teacher first
assesses them before the students assess a selection of them. The work from
the students may well be assessed by the teacher, at least in part, and
the students may well be assessed by the teacher, at least in part, and
very possibly by a number of students. A workshop allows the teacher to award
a proportion of the grade to the student's assessments, the remainder of
the grade is allocated to the assessments of the work itself. (The
a proportion of the grade to the student's assessments, the remainder of
the grade is allocated to the assessments of the work itself. (The
proportions of the grade given to these two areas is set towards the end of
the workshop.) A student's assessments are given a grade based on how well
they match the corresponding assessments make by the teacher. (In the
absence of a teacher assessment then the average of the peer assessments is
the workshop.) A student's assessments are given a grade based on how well
they match the corresponding assessments make by the teacher. (In the
absence of a teacher assessment then the average of the peer assessments is
used).</p>
<p>The degree of agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment is
based on the differences between the scores in individual elements
<p>The degree of agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment is
based on the differences between the scores in individual elements
(actually the squared differences are used). The mean of these differences
must to converted into a meaningful grade. The &quot;Comparison of
Assessments&quot; option allows the teacher a degree of control on how
must to converted into a meaningful grade. The &quot;Comparison of
Assessments&quot; option allows the teacher a degree of control on how
these comparisons are converted into grades.</p>
<p>To get some idea on what effect this option has, take the (fairly simple)
case of an assessment which has ten Yes/No questions. For example the
assessment might use questions like "Is the chart correctly formatted?",
"Is the calculated profit $100.66?", etc. Assume there are ten such
questions. When the &quot;Very Lax&quot; setting is chosen, prefect
<p>To get some idea on what effect this option has, take the (fairly simple)
case of an assessment which has ten Yes/No questions. For example the
assessment might use questions like "Is the chart correctly formatted?",
"Is the calculated profit $100.66?", etc. Assume there are ten such
questions. When the &quot;Very Lax&quot; setting is chosen, prefect
agreement between the student's and teacher's assessment gives a grade of
100%, if there is only one question which does not match the grade is 90%,
two disagreements give a grade of 80%, three
disagreements 70%, etc.. That might seem very reasonable and you might be thinking
why is this option called a &quot;Very Lax&quot; comparison. Well, consider
the case of a student doing a completely random assessment where the
answers of the ten questions are simply
guessed. On average this would result in five of the ten questions being
100%, if there is only one question which does not match the grade is 90%,
two disagreements give a grade of 80%, three
disagreements 70%, etc.. That might seem very reasonable and you might be thinking
why is this option called a &quot;Very Lax&quot; comparison. Well, consider
the case of a student doing a completely random assessment where the
answers of the ten questions are simply
guessed. On average this would result in five of the ten questions being
matched. So the &quot;monkey's&quot; assessment would get a grade of around
50%. The situation gets a little more sensible with the &quot;Lax&quot;
option, then
the random assessment gets around 20%. When the &quot;Fair&quot; option is
chosen, random guessing will result in a zero grade most of the
time. At this level, a grade of 50% is given when the two assessments agree
on eight questions of the ten. If three questions are in disagreement then
the grade given is 25%. When the option is set to &quot;Strict&quot; having
two questions out of sync gives a grade of 40%. Moving into the &quot;Very
Strict&quot; territory a disagreement in just two questions drops the grade to
50%. The situation gets a little more sensible with the &quot;Lax&quot;
option, then
the random assessment gets around 20%. When the &quot;Fair&quot; option is
chosen, random guessing will result in a zero grade most of the
time. At this level, a grade of 50% is given when the two assessments agree
on eight questions of the ten. If three questions are in disagreement then
the grade given is 25%. When the option is set to &quot;Strict&quot; having
two questions out of sync gives a grade of 40%. Moving into the &quot;Very
Strict&quot; territory a disagreement in just two questions drops the grade to
35% and having a single question in disagreement gives a grade of 65%.</p>
<p>This example is sightly artifical as most assessments usually have elements
which have a range of values rather than just Yes or No. In those cases the
<p>This example is sightly artificial as most assessments usually have elements
which have a range of values rather than just Yes or No. In those cases the
comparison is likely to result in somewhat higher grades then the values
indicated above. The various levels (Very Lax, Lax, Fair...) are given so
indicated above. The various levels (Very Lax, Lax, Fair...) are given so
that the teacher can fine tune the comparisons. If they feel that the grades
being given for assessments are too low then this option should be moved
towards the &quot;Lax&quot; or even &quot;Very Lax&quot; choices. And
alternatively, if the grades for the student's assessments are, in general,
felt to be too high this option should be moved to either the
&quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; choices. It is really a
matter of trial and error with the best starting point being the
being given for assessments are too low then this option should be moved
towards the &quot;Lax&quot; or even &quot;Very Lax&quot; choices. And
alternatively, if the grades for the student's assessments are, in general,
felt to be too high this option should be moved to either the
&quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; choices. It is really a
matter of trial and error with the best starting point being the
&quot;Fair&quot; option.</p>
<p>During the course of the workshop the teacher may feel that the grades given
to the student assessments are either too high or too low. These grades are
shown on the exercise's Administration Page. In this case, the teacher can
change the setting of this option and re-calculate the student assessment
grades (the &quot;Grading Grades&quot;). The re-calculation is done by
grades (the &quot;Grading Grades&quot;). The re-calculation is done by
clicking the &quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link found on the
administration page of the workshop. This can be safely performed at any
administration page of the workshop. This can be safely performed at any
time in the workshop.</p>
+40 -40
View File
@@ -1,59 +1,59 @@
<p align="center"><b>Assignment Elements</b></p>
<p>For ease of grading, a Workshop Assignment should have a reasonable
number of &quot;Assessment Elements&quot;. Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </p>
<p>For ease of grading, a Workshop Assignment should have a reasonable
number of &quot;Assessment Elements&quot;. Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment. </p>
<p>The type of elements dependent of the assignment's grading strategy.</p>
<p><b>Not Graded.</b> The elements are descriptions of aspects of the assignment.
The assessor is asked to comment on each of these aspects. As with all the grading
strategies, there is also an area for general comments.</p>
<p><b>Not Graded.</b> The elements are descriptions of aspects of the assignment.
The assessor is asked to comment on each of these aspects. As with all the grading
strategies, there is also an area for general comments.</p>
<p><b>Accumulative Grading.</b> The elements have the following three features:
<ol>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualatative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of prefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be choosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</li>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualitative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
<li>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of predefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be chosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
</ol>
</p>
<p><b>Error Banded Grading.</b> The elements will normally describe certain items
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on the
present or absence of these items or aspects. The teacher must all set of grade table which
give the suggested grades when all the items are present, when one is absent, when two are
absent, etc. If certain items are more important than others then those items can be given
a weighting greater than one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The
overall &quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
can always make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</p>
<p><b>Error Banded Grading.</b> The elements will normally describe certain items
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on the
present or absence of these items or aspects. The teacher must all set of grade table which
give the suggested grades when all the items are present, when one is absent, when two are
absent, etc. If certain items are more important than others then those items can be given
a weighting greater than one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The
overall &quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
can always make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</p>
<p><b>Criterion Grading.</b> The elements will give a set of &quot;level&quot; statements
which can be used to rank the assignment. The statements may be cumulative or they may
which can be used to rank the assignment. The statements may be cumulative or they may
each be self contained. The assessor must decide which statement best fits each piece of
work. The teacher must also relate each criterion statement with a suggested grade. These
should normally be in order. The assessor can make a minor adjustment to these
should normally be in order. The assessor can make a minor adjustment to these
suggested grades.</p>
<p><b>Rubric Grading.</b> This is similar to Criterion Grading but there is more than
+14 -14
View File
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Final Grades</b></p>
<p>The table on this screen lists the final grades and their breakdown as shown to
the students. If there are missing values in the table then it is possible to &quot;go back&quot;
and add these. In fact, there are two adjustments which can be made to the Final Grades.
<p>The table on this screen lists the final grades and their breakdown as shown to
the students. If there are missing values in the table then it is possible to &quot;go back&quot;
and add these. In fact, there are two adjustments which can be made to the Final Grades.
<ol>
<li>If a teacher's grade needs to be added then the piece of work can be
graded by going
to the teacher's Management screen for assignment and clicking on the link &quot;Student
Submissions for Assessment&quot;. Any otherstanding submissions can be graded. Once this has
been done then move the assignment back to Phase 3 and re-calculate the Final grades. In a
similar way any assessments which have not been graded can be graded from the Management
screen.</li>
<li>If a teacher's grade needs to be added then the piece of work can be
graded by going
to the teacher's Management screen for assignment and clicking on the link &quot;Student
Submissions for Assessment&quot;. Any outstanding submissions can be graded. Once this has
been done then move the assignment back to Phase 3 and re-calculate the Final grades. In a
similar way any assessments which have not been graded can be graded from the Management
screen.</li>
<li>If it is desired to use a different weighting scheme then the assignment should be moved
back to Phase 3 and link &quot;Calculate Final Grades&quot; can be clicked and the new
weights entered. After the grades have been re-calcualted the assignment should be moved
to Phase 4 to make the new grades available.</li>
back to Phase 3 and link &quot;Calculate Final Grades&quot; can be clicked and the new
weights entered. After the grades have been re-calculated the assignment should be moved
to Phase 4 to make the new grades available.</li>
</ol>
</p>
+21 -21
View File
@@ -1,32 +1,32 @@
<p align="center"><b>Grading of Peer Assignments</b></p>
<p>For ease of grading a Peer Assignment is divided into a number of
assessment &quot;elements&quot;. Each element covers
a particular aspect of the assignment. Depending on the type of assessment,
for each element you should
<p>For ease of grading a Peer Assignment is divided into a number of
assessment &quot;elements&quot;. Each element covers
a particular aspect of the assignment. Depending on the type of assessment,
for each element you should
<ol>
<li>Enter a Grade by clicking in the appropriate button or selecting an appropriate
number from the drop down menu.</li>
<li>Enter an explaination of why you gave that grade in the Feedback box. If
you feel that the reason is obvious then leave the box empty. Note, however,
that the teacher may look at your assessment and may well query a grade
if there is no explaination.</li>
number from the drop down menu.</li>
<li>Enter an explanation of why you gave that grade in the Feedback box. If
you feel that the reason is obvious then leave the box empty. Note, however,
that the teacher may look at your assessment and may well query a grade
if there is no explanation.</li>
</ol>
<p>In other type of asessments, you are asked to determine if various items
are present or absent, in others you are asked to choose which statement best
fits the piece of work. In both of these assignments you can adjust the grade
somewhat as you see fit.</p>
<p>In other type of assessments, you are asked to determine if various items
are present or absent, in others you are asked to choose which statement best
fits the piece of work. In both of these assignments you can adjust the grade
somewhat as you see fit.</p>
<p>The last box on this form allows you to make a general comment on the
work. This should justify your assessment. It should be polite and as far as
possible constructive. Your assessment will be shown to the student who
produced the piece of work.</p>
<p>The last box on this form allows you to make a general comment on the
work. This should justify your assessment. It should be polite and as far as
possible constructive. Your assessment will be shown to the student who
produced the piece of work.</p>
<p>You have a limited period of time, typically half an hour, in which to
change your mind and alter your grades or comments. Once that period
is over the person whose work you are assessing is notified about the assessment.
At that stage you can view your assessment but you cannot change it.
change your mind and alter your grades or comments. Once that period
is over the person whose work you are assessing is notified about the assessment.
At that stage you can view your assessment but you cannot change it.
</p>
+18 -18
View File
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
<p align="center"><b>Grading the Student Assessments</b></p>
<p>This screen is used to enter the teacher's grade for the assessment made
by the student during the submission and assessment phase of the assignment. A relatively
simple grading is used, the score out of 20. The treacher can decide what is
being graded and the relative scores from the instructions given to the students
before the assignment started. For example, at a higher level the students may be
required to give critical comments, at an intermediate level the students may be
required to point out strengths and weaknesses, and at a lower level the students
may be simply pointing out errors and inaccuracies.</p>
by the student during the submission and assessment phase of the assignment. A relatively
simple grading is used, the score out of 20. The teacher can decide what is
being graded and the relative scores from the instructions given to the students
before the assignment started. For example, at a higher level the students may be
required to give critical comments, at an intermediate level the students may be
required to point out strengths and weaknesses, and at a lower level the students
may be simply pointing out errors and inaccuracies.</p>
<p>If available the Teacher's own assessment is shown before that of the
student so an easy comparison can be made. The teacher's own
comments can act as a kind of benchmark.</p>
student so an easy comparison can be made. The teacher's own
comments can act as a kind of benchmark.</p>
<p>The grade for the assessment is
saved by clicking on the apprpriate button at the foot of the page. There is a
chance to repeat the grading within the &quot;editing&quot; period. Once that
time has elapsed the teacher's comment is made available to the student. The
&quot;grading grade&quot;, however, is not revealed to the student until the
final grades are made available. (The reason for this is the likely confusion
between the grade for the piece of work and the grade for the ASSESSMENT
of that work, at an early stage of an assignment the distinction will not be
clear to students.)</p>
saved by clicking on the appropriate button at the foot of the page. There is a
chance to repeat the grading within the &quot;editing&quot; period. Once that
time has elapsed the teacher's comment is made available to the student. The
&quot;grading grade&quot;, however, is not revealed to the student until the
final grades are made available. (The reason for this is the likely confusion
between the grade for the piece of work and the grade for the ASSESSMENT
of that work, at an early stage of an assignment the distinction will not be
clear to students.)</p>
+13 -13
View File
@@ -2,25 +2,25 @@
<p>This is the maximum grade given to the assessments make by students of their
own and/or other work. That is, the grade for their assessments. The actual
grades for an assessment is calculated by the workshop module by comparing
that assessment with the "best" assessment of the same submission. The
grades for an assessment is calculated by the workshop module by comparing
that assessment with the "best" assessment of the same submission. The
&quot;best&quot; assessment is the one which is closest to the mean of all
the assessments. (This is a &quot;weighted&quot; mean if the teacher's
the assessments. (This is a &quot;weighted&quot; mean if the teacher's
assessment are given a weight greater than one.) Note that if there is only
one assessment of an submission, that single assessemnt is taken as the
best. If there are are two assessments of an submission, both are
one assessment of an submission, that single assessment is taken as the
best. If there are two assessments of an submission, both are
considered &quot;best&quot;. Only when there are three or more assessments
does the module start to make distinctions between the assessments.</p>
<p>This grade is sometimes called the &quot;grading grade&quot; and is
<i><b>not</b></i> the maximum grade given to the work, that grade is called
&quot;Grade for Submissions&quot;.</p>
<p>A student's grade for the workshop is the sum of this grade and the grade
for their submission(s). Thus if the (maximum) grade for the Student
assessments is set at 20 and the (maximum) grade for submission is set to
<p>This grade is sometimes called the &quot;grading grade&quot; and is
<i><b>not</b></i> the maximum grade given to the work, that grade is called
&quot;Grade for Submissions&quot;.</p>
<p>A student's grade for the workshop is the sum of this grade and the grade
for their submission(s). Thus if the (maximum) grade for the Student
assessments is set at 20 and the (maximum) grade for submission is set to
80, then the (maximum) grade for the workshop is 100.</p>
<p>This value can be changed at any time and the effect on the grades seen by
the students (and the teacher) is immediate.</p>
+63 -63
View File
@@ -3,77 +3,77 @@
<p>A workshop assignment is quite flexible in the type of grading scheme used. This can be:
<ol>
<li><b>No grading:</b> In this type of assignment the teacher is not
interested in quantative assessment from the students at all. The students
make comments of the pieces of works but not grade them. The teacher,
however, can, if desired, grade the student comments. These
&quot;grading grades&quot; form the basis of the students' final grades.
If the teacher does not grade the student assessments then the assignment
does not have any final grades.</li>
<li><b>No grading:</b> In this type of assignment the teacher is not
interested in quantitative assessment from the students at all. The students
make comments of the pieces of works but not grade them. The teacher,
however, can, if desired, grade the student comments. These
&quot;grading grades&quot; form the basis of the students' final grades.
If the teacher does not grade the student assessments then the assignment
does not have any final grades.</li>
<li><b>Accumulative grading:</b> This is the default type of grading.
In this type of assignment the grade of each
assessment is made up of a number of &quot;assessment elements&quot;.
Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment.
In this type of assignment the grade of each
assessment is made up of a number of &quot;assessment elements&quot;.
Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment.
<p>Elements have the following three features:
<ol>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualatative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of prefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be choosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</li>
<li>The DESCRIPTION of the assessment element. This should clearly state what
aspect of the assignment is being assessed. If the assessment is qualitative
it is helpful to give details of what is considered excellent, average
and poor.</li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
<li>The SCALE of the assessment element. There are a number of predefined
scales. These range from simple Yes/No scales, through multipoint scales to
a full percentage scale. Each element has its own scale which should be chosen
to fit the number of possible variations for that element. Note that the scale
does NOT determine the element's importance when calculating the overall
grade, a two point scale has the same &quot;influence&quot; as a 100 point
scale if the respective elements have the same weight...</li>
<li>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.</li>
</ol></li>
<li><b>Error Banded Grading:</b> In this type of assignment the submissions are
graded on a set of Yes/No scales. The grade is determined by the &quot;Grade
Table &quot; which gives the relationship between the number of
&quot;errors&quot; and the suggested grade. For example an assignment may have six
significant items which should be present, the Grade Table will give suggested
grades if all are present, one is absent, if two are absent, etc. The individual
items can, if desired, be given weighting factors if some items are more important
than others. The number of &quot;errors&quot; is a weighted sum of the items not
present. By default each item is given a weight of one. The grading table is likely
to be non-linear, for example
the sugested grades may be 90%, 70%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, 0%, 0%, 0% for
an assignment with 10 items.The assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up
to 20% either way to give the submission's final grade.</li>
<li><b>Criteria Grading:</b> This is simpliest type of assessment to grade (although
not necessarily the most straightforward to set up). The submissions are
graded against a set of criteria statments. The assessor choses which statement
best fits the piece of work. The grade is determined by a &quot;Criteria
Table&quot; which gives the suggested grade for each criterion. For example
an assignment may be set up with, say, five criteria statements and the assessors
must then choose one of the five statements for each of their assessments. As with
the Banded assignment the assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up to
20% to give the final grade.</li>
<li><b>Error Banded Grading:</b> In this type of assignment the submissions are
graded on a set of Yes/No scales. The grade is determined by the &quot;Grade
Table &quot; which gives the relationship between the number of
&quot;errors&quot; and the suggested grade. For example an assignment may have six
significant items which should be present, the Grade Table will give suggested
grades if all are present, one is absent, if two are absent, etc. The individual
items can, if desired, be given weighting factors if some items are more important
than others. The number of &quot;errors&quot; is a weighted sum of the items not
present. By default each item is given a weight of one. The grading table is likely
to be non-linear, for example
the suggested grades may be 90%, 70%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, 0%, 0%, 0% for
an assignment with 10 items.The assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up
to 20% either way to give the submission's final grade.</li>
<li><b>Criteria Grading:</b> This is the simplest type of assessment to grade (although
not necessarily the most straightforward to set up). The submissions are
graded against a set of criteria statements. The assessor chooses which statement
best fits the piece of work. The grade is determined by a &quot;Criteria
Table&quot; which gives the suggested grade for each criterion. For example
an assignment may be set up with, say, five criteria statements and the assessors
must then choose one of the five statements for each of their assessments. As with
the Banded assignment the assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up to
20% to give the final grade.</li>
<li><b>Rubric</b> This is a similar to Criterion Grading except there are multiple
sets of criteria. Each set covering a particular &quot;Category&quot;, can have
up to five statements. The sets are given individual
weights and the grade is a weighted combination of the scores from each set. There
is <b>no</b> adjustment option in this assessment type. </li>
sets of criteria. Each set covering a particular &quot;Category&quot;, can have
up to five statements. The sets are given individual
weights and the grade is a weighted combination of the scores from each set. There
is <b>no</b> adjustment option in this assessment type. </li>
</ol>
</p>
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
<p align="center"><b>Grading of Student Submissions</b></p>
<p>In general, it is recommended that the teacher assesses a fair proportion of
the work submitted by the students. The assessments are shown to the
the work submitted by the students. The assessments are shown to the
students and will provide important feedback on their work.</p>
<p>The assessments from the teacher are used in two ways in the workshop
module. Firstly, they are used in the calculations to determine
<p>The assessments from the teacher are used in two ways in the workshop
module. Firstly, they are used in the calculations to determine
the &quot;grading grades&quot;, the grades given the student assessments.
Secondly they are used in the calculation of the submission grades. These
assessments can be given extra weight (the &quot;Weight of Teacher
assessments can be given extra weight (the &quot;Weight of Teacher
Assessments&quot; option), this weighting effects both the grading grade
and the submission grade calculations. If it felt that the student
assessments are too high (or too low), increasing this weighting factor
should be considered as that will help stablise the grades to a degree.
and the submission grade calculations. If it felt that the student
assessments are too high (or too low), increasing this weighting factor
should be considered as that will help stabilise the grades to a degree.
</p>
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
<p align="center"><b>Include Teacher's Grade</b></p>
<p>This option allows the teacher's assessments of the submissions to be included
as though they were peer assessments. If this option is set to YES then the teacher's
assessments are in effect counted twice, firstly as the normal teacher's
assessment and secondly by including them in the pool of peer assessments.
The teacher might want to do this if (a) the number of peer assessments of
each submission is low or (b) to try to stablise the peer assessments when
they appear to be either biased or unreliable.</p>
as though they were peer assessments. If this option is set to YES then the teacher's
assessments are in effect counted twice, firstly as the normal teacher's
assessment and secondly by including them in the pool of peer assessments.
The teacher might want to do this if (a) the number of peer assessments of
each submission is low or (b) to try to stabilise the peer assessments when
they appear to be either biased or unreliable.</p>
+97 -97
View File
@@ -1,123 +1,123 @@
<p align="center"><b>Managing a Workshop Assignment</b></p>
<p>A Workshop Assignment is more complex than an ordinary assignment.
It involves a number of steps or phases. These are</p>
It involves a number of steps or phases. These are</p>
<ol>
<li><p><b>Set Up Assignment</b> The assessment of the assignment
should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes
the grading of an assignment less arbitary and gives the students a
framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of
setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See
that page for more details.)</p>
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a
small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the
students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However,
before the assignment is made available to students, these example
pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher
with specimen &quot;answers&quot; when reviewing the students' assessments
of those examples (produced in the next phase).</p>
<p>The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional
and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions</b> The assignment is now opened
to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work, the students
are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of
assessments is given when the assignment is created.) Once a student has
made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own
work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free
to submit their own work without any delay.</p>
<li><p><b>Set Up Assignment</b> The assessment of the assignment
should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes
the grading of an assignment less arbitrary and gives the students a
framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of
setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See
that page for more details.)</p>
<p>The advantage of leaving the assignment in the Submission phase is to allow
a build up of submissions. When they are subsequently allocated, in the next
two phases, there is better distribution of work. If the assignment is put
straight into the &quot;Allow Submissions and Assessments&quot; phase from
the &quot;Set Up&quot; phase (which is allowed) students who submit early
will tend to have early submissions to assess and those students who submit
late will tend to have late submissions to assess. Adding a &quot;delay&quot;
before peer assessment starts will eleviate that problem to a large extent. </p>
<p>When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that
work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These
assessments can take place in the submission and assessment phases of the
assignment. Provided the teacher's assessments are made before the calculation
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a
small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the
students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However,
before the assignment is made available to students, these example
pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher
with specimen &quot;answers&quot; when reviewing the students' assessments
of those examples (produced in the next phase).</p>
<p>The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional
and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions</b> The assignment is now opened
to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work, the students
are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of
assessments is given when the assignment is created.) Once a student has
made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own
work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free
to submit their own work without any delay.</p>
<p>The advantage of leaving the assignment in the Submission phase is to allow
a build up of submissions. When they are subsequently allocated, in the next
two phases, there is better distribution of work. If the assignment is put
straight into the &quot;Allow Submissions and Assessments&quot; phase from
the &quot;Set Up&quot; phase (which is allowed) students who submit early
will tend to have early submissions to assess and those students who submit
late will tend to have late submissions to assess. Adding a &quot;delay&quot;
before peer assessment starts will alleviate that problem to a large extent. </p>
<p>When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that
work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These
assessments can take place in the submission and assessment phases of the
assignment. Provided the teacher's assessments are made before the calculation
of the final grades they can used in that calculation.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions and Assessments</b> If the assignment includes
peer assessment, students who have submitted work are now shown other students'
work to assess. Students who have not yet submitted work are allowed to submit
their work (but they are <b>not</b> show other students' work to access).
In this phase, submissions, re-submissions and assessments of submissions
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions and Assessments</b> If the assignment includes
peer assessment, students who have submitted work are now shown other students'
work to assess. Students who have not yet submitted work are allowed to submit
their work (but they are <b>not</b> show other students' work to access).
In this phase, submissions, re-submissions and assessments of submissions
and re-submissions are allowed to take place together. </p>
<p>The teacher may want to split the submission of work and its peer assessment
into two distinct phases, waiting for all students to submit their work before
going into the peer assessment phase. In that case this phase is not used at all,
the assignment goes from &quot;Allow Submissions&quot; straight to &quot;Allow
Assessments&quot;. This allows the teacher to place a deadline on submissions,
the assignment is moved into the &quot;Allow Assessments&quot; phase at that
<p>The teacher may want to split the submission of work and its peer assessment
into two distinct phases, waiting for all students to submit their work before
going into the peer assessment phase. In that case this phase is not used at all,
the assignment goes from &quot;Allow Submissions&quot; straight to &quot;Allow
Assessments&quot;. This allows the teacher to place a deadline on submissions,
the assignment is moved into the &quot;Allow Assessments&quot; phase at that
deadline.</p>
<p>If the teacher, on the other hand, does not want such as clear cut division in
the assignment, then the assignment uses this phase. When allowing submissions
and assessments to occur together, the teacher should consider setting the
<p>If the teacher, on the other hand, does not want such as clear cut division in
the assignment, then the assignment uses this phase. When allowing submissions
and assessments to occur together, the teacher should consider setting the
Over Allocation Level to ONE (or possibly TWO) to allow the allocations
to go smoothly (see the Admin page for more details). Note that doing this will
result in some submissions being (peer) assessed more times and some less
times than the majority of the submissions.</p>
<p>When a student has made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The
student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option
was chosen for the assignment. The teacher can, if desired, grade these peer
assessments and these scores can be taken forward towards the students' final
grades (but that is not really necessary in many cases, see the Calculation of
to go smoothly (see the Admin page for more details). Note that doing this will
result in some submissions being (peer) assessed more times and some less
times than the majority of the submissions.</p>
<p>When a student has made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The
student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option
was chosen for the assignment. The teacher can, if desired, grade these peer
assessments and these scores can be taken forward towards the students' final
grades (but that is not really necessary in many cases, see the Calculation of
Final Grades phase).</p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Assessments</b> In this phase peer assessments continue but
students are not allowed to make any submissions, that includes re-submissions.
<li><p><b>Allow Student Assessments</b> In this phase peer assessments continue but
students are not allowed to make any submissions, that includes re-submissions.
Students who have not made a submission are told that submissions are no longer
allowed and they are <b>not</b> shown any (peer) submissions to assess.</p>
<p>The teacher can continue, if desired, to grade the peer assessments and
these scores can be taken forward towards the students' final grades (but
<p>The teacher can continue, if desired, to grade the peer assessments and
these scores can be taken forward towards the students' final grades (but
that is not really necessary in many cases, see the next phase).</p></li>
<li><p><b>Calculation of Final Grades</b> After the deadline has passed, the teacher
moves the assignment to the next phase where further assessments
by students are not allowed. The teacher can, if wished, complete the grading of
assessments made on the examples and the grading of the student submissions.
They can also grade the peer assessments made by the students. This is <b>not</b>
really necessary as, provided a reasonable number of assessments have been made on
each submission, the &quot;grading performance&quot; of each student can be
determined from the relative scores. </p>
<p>When the grading has been completed, the teacher calculates the final grades
of the students. These final grades are normally made up of three components,
teacher's grade of the student's work, mean peer grade of the student's work
and the student's grading performance. The last can include the mean &quot;grading
grade&quot; entered by the teacher against a student's comments. These three
components are given weights by the teacher before the calculation of the final
grades takes place.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Calculation of Final Grades</b> After the deadline has passed, the teacher
moves the assignment to the next phase where further assessments
by students are not allowed. The teacher can, if wished, complete the grading of
assessments made on the examples and the grading of the student submissions.
They can also grade the peer assessments made by the students. This is <b>not</b>
really necessary as, provided a reasonable number of assessments have been made on
each submission, the &quot;grading performance&quot; of each student can be
determined from the relative scores. </p>
<li><p><b>Display of Final Grades</b> The final phase of the assignment is entered
to allow the students to see their final grades. The teacher can, if desired, backtrack
the assignment to allow some adjustment of, say, the weights used in the final grade
calculation, the revised grades can then be shown to the students.</p>
<p>When the grading has been completed, the teacher calculates the final grades
of the students. These final grades are normally made up of three components,
teacher's grade of the student's work, mean peer grade of the student's work
and the student's grading performance. The last can include the mean &quot;grading
grade&quot; entered by the teacher against a student's comments. These three
components are given weights by the teacher before the calculation of the final
grades takes place.</p></li>
<p>The students (and the teacher) are also shown a &quot;League Table&quot;
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission
is first. Here the grade given to the submission is a combination of the teacher's
grade and the average of the peer grades (if they are available). The weighting
used is that given during the previous phase.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Display of Final Grades</b> The final phase of the assignment is entered
to allow the students to see their final grades. The teacher can, if desired, backtrack
the assignment to allow some adjustment of, say, the weights used in the final grade
calculation, the revised grades can then be shown to the students.</p>
<p>The students (and the teacher) are also shown a &quot;League Table&quot;
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission
is first. Here the grade given to the submission is a combination of the teacher's
grade and the average of the peer grades (if they are available). The weighting
used is that given during the previous phase.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the &quot;Administration&quot;
page. This shows the current state of the assignment. It lists the Teacher's example
submissions (if any), the students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own
work, and of other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students.
The teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, grade and
re-grade assessments, delete submissions and assessments, and generally watch
submissions (if any), the students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own
work, and of other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students.
The teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, grade and
re-grade assessments, delete submissions and assessments, and generally watch
the progress of the assignment.</p>
+75 -75
View File
@@ -1,97 +1,97 @@
<p align="center"><b>Managing a Workshop Assignment</b></p>
<p>A Workshop Assignment is more complex than an ordinary assignment.
It involves a number of steps or phases. These are</p>
It involves a number of steps or phases. These are</p>
<ol>
<li><p><b>Set Up Assignment</b> The assessment of the assignment
should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes
the grading of an assignment less arbitary and gives the students a
framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of
setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See
that page for more details.)</p>
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a
small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the
students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However,
before the assignment is made available to students, these example
pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher
with specimen &quot;answers&quot; when reviewing the students' assessments
of those examples (produced in the next phase).</p>
<p>The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional
and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions</b> The assignment is now opened
to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work, the students
are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of
assessments is given when the assignment is created.) Once a student has
made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own
work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free
to submit their own work without any delay.</p>
<li><p><b>Set Up Assignment</b> The assessment of the assignment
should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes
the grading of an assignment less arbitrary and gives the students a
framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of
setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See
that page for more details.)</p>
<p>The advantage of leaving the assignment in the Submission phase is to allow
a build up of submissions. When they are subsequently allocated, in the next
two phases, there is better distribution of work. If the assignment is put
straight into the &quot;Allow Submissions and Assessments&quot; phase from
the &quot;Set Up&quot; phase (which is allowed) students who submit early
will tend to have early submissions to assess and those students who submit
late will tend to have late submissions to assess. Adding a &quot;delay&quot;
before peer assessment starts will eleviate that problem to a large extent. </p>
<p>When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that
work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These
assessments can take place in the submission and assessment phases of the
assignment.</p>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions and Assessments</b> If the assignment includes
peer assessment, students who have submitted work are now shown other students'
work to assess. Students who have not yet submitted work are allowed to submit
their work (but they are <b>not</b> shown other students' work to access).
In this phase, submissions, re-submissions and assessments of submissions
<p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a
small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the
students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However,
before the assignment is made available to students, these example
pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher
with specimen &quot;answers&quot; when reviewing the students' assessments
of those examples (produced in the next phase).</p>
<p>The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional
and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.</p>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions</b> The assignment is now opened
to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work, the students
are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of
assessments is given when the assignment is created.) Once a student has
made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own
work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free
to submit their own work without any delay.</p>
<p>The advantage of leaving the assignment in the Submission phase is to allow
a build up of submissions. When they are subsequently allocated, in the next
two phases, there is better distribution of work. If the assignment is put
straight into the &quot;Allow Submissions and Assessments&quot; phase from
the &quot;Set Up&quot; phase (which is allowed) students who submit early
will tend to have early submissions to assess and those students who submit
late will tend to have late submissions to assess. Adding a &quot;delay&quot;
before peer assessment starts will alleviate that problem to a large extent. </p>
<p>When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that
work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These
assessments can take place in the submission and assessment phases of the
assignment.</p>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions and Assessments</b> If the assignment includes
peer assessment, students who have submitted work are now shown other students'
work to assess. Students who have not yet submitted work are allowed to submit
their work (but they are <b>not</b> shown other students' work to access).
In this phase, submissions, re-submissions and assessments of submissions
and re-submissions are allowed to take place together. </p>
<p>The teacher may want to split the submission of work and its peer assessment
into two distinct phases, waiting for all students to submit their work before
going into the peer assessment phase. In that case this phase is not used at all,
the assignment goes from &quot;Allow Submissions&quot; straight to &quot;Allow
Assessments&quot;. This allows the teacher to place a deadline on submissions,
the assignment is moved into the &quot;Allow Assessments&quot; phase at that
<p>The teacher may want to split the submission of work and its peer assessment
into two distinct phases, waiting for all students to submit their work before
going into the peer assessment phase. In that case this phase is not used at all,
the assignment goes from &quot;Allow Submissions&quot; straight to &quot;Allow
Assessments&quot;. This allows the teacher to place a deadline on submissions,
the assignment is moved into the &quot;Allow Assessments&quot; phase at that
deadline.</p>
<p>If the teacher, on the other hand, does not want such as clear cut division in
the assignment, then the assignment uses this phase. When allowing submissions
and assessments to occur together, the teacher should consider setting the
<p>If the teacher, on the other hand, does not want such as clear cut division in
the assignment, then the assignment uses this phase. When allowing submissions
and assessments to occur together, the teacher should consider setting the
Over Allocation Level to ONE (or possibly TWO) to allow the allocations
to go smoothly (see the help page on that option for more details). Note
that doing this will result in <b>some</b> submissions being (peer) assessed more
to go smoothly (see the help page on that option for more details). Note
that doing this will result in <b>some</b> submissions being (peer) assessed more
times and some less times than the majority of the submissions.</p>
<p>When a student has made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The
student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option
was chosen for the assignment. </p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Assessments</b> In this phase peer assessments continue but
students are not allowed to make any submissions, that includes re-submissions.
<p>When a student has made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The
student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option
was chosen for the assignment. </p></li>
<li><p><b>Allow Student Assessments</b> In this phase peer assessments continue but
students are not allowed to make any submissions, that includes re-submissions.
Students who have not made a submission are told that submissions are no longer
allowed and they are <b>not</b> shown any (peer) submissions to assess.</p></li>
<li><p><b>Display of Final Grades</b> The final phase of the assignment is entered
to allow the students to see their final grades in detail. The individual
assessments which contribute to the final grade of each submission can be
<li><p><b>Display of Final Grades</b> The final phase of the assignment is entered
to allow the students to see their final grades in detail. The individual
assessments which contribute to the final grade of each submission can be
easily reviewed.</p>
<p>The students (and the teacher) are shown an optional &quot;League Table&quot;
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission
is first.</p></li>
of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission
is first.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the
&quot;Administration&quot; page. This shows the current state of the
assignment. It lists the Teacher's example submissions (if any), the
students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own work, and of
other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students. The
teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, delete
submissions and assessments, and generally watch the progress of the
<p>At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the
&quot;Administration&quot; page. This shows the current state of the
assignment. It lists the Teacher's example submissions (if any), the
students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own work, and of
other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students. The
teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, delete
submissions and assessments, and generally watch the progress of the
assignment.</p>
+10 -10
View File
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
<p align="center"><b>Number of Attachment expected on Submissions</b></p>
<p>The number entered here determines how many &quot;upload boxes&quot; are
shown when the student submits a piece of work. The number can be zero,
<p>The number entered here determines how many &quot;upload boxes&quot; are
shown when the student submits a piece of work. The number can be zero,
that is no attachments are allowed. If attachments are expected, the number
is set to 1, 2, up to 5. Normally the number will be 0 or 1, but in some
is set to 1, 2, up to 5. Normally the number will be 0 or 1, but in some
assignments the students may be asked to submit more than one attachment.</p>
<p>If the number is set to 3, say, and the student only attaches two files to
their submission, the two files are attached and there is <b>no</b> warning
message. Thus, when submitting work (in a single operation) students can
attach an arbitary number of files to their submissions, up to the maximum
<p>If the number is set to 3, say, and the student only attaches two files to
their submission, the two files are attached and there is <b>no</b> warning
message. Thus, when submitting work (in a single operation) students can
attach an arbitrary number of files to their submissions, up to the maximum
number given by this option.</p>
<p>Note this option does <b>not</b> set the maximum number of attachments a student
can add to their submission. It just determines how many &quot;upload
<p>Note this option does <b>not</b> set the maximum number of attachments a student
can add to their submission. It just determines how many &quot;upload
boxes&quot; are shown. The student is free to add more attachments to their
submission by editing that submission. This would be unusual.</p>
<p>The default value for this option is zero, that is no attachments are
<p>The default value for this option is zero, that is no attachments are
required.</p>
+19 -19
View File
@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
<p align="center"><b>The Over Allocation Level</b></p>
<p>This level determines whether the allocation of peer assessments to the class
is balanced or not. Here the term &quot;balanced&quot; applies to the number
of times each student submission is allocated for (peer) assessment. When the
Over Allocation Level is set to ZERO, all the submissions are allocated the same
number of times, that is, the allocation is balanced. When the Level is set to ONE
then some of the submissions may be alocated once more than other allocations
(and it follows from this that some of the submissions may be allocated once
less than other allocations), that is the allocation is unbalanced. Similiarly if the
<p>This level determines whether the allocation of peer assessments to the class
is balanced or not. Here the term &quot;balanced&quot; applies to the number
of times each student submission is allocated for (peer) assessment. When the
Over Allocation Level is set to ZERO, all the submissions are allocated the same
number of times, that is, the allocation is balanced. When the Level is set to ONE
then some of the submissions may be allocated once more than other allocations
(and it follows from this that some of the submissions may be allocated once
less than other allocations), that is the allocation is unbalanced. Similarly if the
Level is set to TWO then a greater unbalance is allowed.</p>
<p>Ideally all peer assessments should be balanced. However, the disadvantage
is that some students will not have their full quota of submissions to assess
until AFTER the last student has submitted their work. When the Over Allocation
Level is set to ONE, then most students will find that they have their full
&quot;quota&quot; of submissions to assess and they do <b>not</b> have to
wait for late submissions. Waiting for late submissions should be even rarer
<p>Ideally all peer assessments should be balanced. However, the disadvantage
is that some students will not have their full quota of submissions to assess
until AFTER the last student has submitted their work. When the Over Allocation
Level is set to ONE, then most students will find that they have their full
&quot;quota&quot; of submissions to assess and they do <b>not</b> have to
wait for late submissions. Waiting for late submissions should be even rarer
when the level is set to TWO.</p>
<p>So in a Workshop assignment where the number of peer assessments is
set to 5, and there is no concerns that some of the submissions will be (peer)
assessed 4 times, some 5 times and others 6 times, then the assignment
will &quot;flow&quot; smoother and the the students will not have to wait so
long (if at all) for others to submit work if the Over Allocation Level is
<p>So in a Workshop assignment where the number of peer assessments is
set to 5, and there is no concerns that some of the submissions will be (peer)
assessed 4 times, some 5 times and others 6 times, then the assignment
will &quot;flow&quot; smoother and the students will not have to wait so
long (if at all) for others to submit work if the Over Allocation Level is
changed from its default value of ZERO and set to ONE.</p>
+8 -8
View File
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
<p align="center"><b>Re-grading Student Assessments</b></p>
<p>This link re-calculates the &quot;Grading grades&quot; of all the student
<p>This link re-calculates the &quot;Grading grades&quot; of all the student
assessments which have a corresponding teacher assessment. Normally it is
<b>not</b> necessary to action this re-calculation. Student assessments
are automatically graded after the teacher has assessed the relavant piece
are automatically graded after the teacher has assessed the relevant piece
of work from the student.</p>
<p>If, however, the Grading grades are felt to be too high or too low the
teacher may wish to change the &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option
(by Updating the Exercise). The default value of this option is
&quot;Fair&quot;. If the grading grades are too high then setting the
<p>If, however, the Grading grades are felt to be too high or too low the
teacher may wish to change the &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option
(by Updating the Exercise). The default value of this option is
&quot;Fair&quot;. If the grading grades are too high then setting the
option to either &quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; will reduce
the grades. Or alternatively if the grades are too low, setting the option
the grades. Or alternatively if the grades are too low, setting the option
to &quot; Lax&quot; or &quot;Very Lax&quot; will increase the grades.</p>
<p>If a change to the Grading grades is required the steps are:
<ol>
<li>Update the Workshop with the new value of the Comparison of Assessments
option;</li>
<li>Go to to the Workshop's Administration page and click on the
<li>Go to the Workshop's Administration page and click on the
&quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link.</li>
</ol>
The new grades will be displayed. These process can be safely repeated.</p>
+9 -9
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<p align="center"><b>Specimen Assessment Form</b></p>
<p>This page shows shows the details of the actual form used to grade
your assignment. It will be used by the teacher to grade your work. Further,
in a peer graded asignment, the same form will be used by yourself and
your fellow students to grade the submitted pieces of work.</p>
<p>Please note that although you can change the grades on
this form these changes are NOT saved. This is simply a specimen form,
but a very similar form will be used by the teacher and possibly by you
during this assignment.</p>
<p>This page shows the details of the actual form used to grade
your assignment. It will be used by the teacher to grade your work. Further,
in a peer graded assignment, the same form will be used by yourself and
your fellow students to grade the submitted pieces of work.</p>
<p>Please note that although you can change the grades on
this form these changes are NOT saved. This is simply a specimen form,
but a very similar form will be used by the teacher and possibly by you
during this assignment.</p>
+22 -22
View File
@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
<p align="center"><b>Submission of Teacher's Examples</b></p>
<p>If the students are required to assess some example pieces of work
before submitting their own work, the teacher uses this link to submit
that work. The teacher can submit any number of pieces of work. If the
number of pieces of work is greater than the number of example
assessments each student must make, then the work is allocated in a
random but balanced fashion. The system tries to assure that each of
the examples is allocated to the students the same number of times.
The allocation is random in that if, say, ten examples are submitted then
it is highly unlikely that the first student is allocated submissions
1, 2 and 3 to assess.</p>
<p>If the students are required to assess some example pieces of work
before submitting their own work, the teacher uses this link to submit
that work. The teacher can submit any number of pieces of work. If the
number of pieces of work is greater than the number of example
assessments each student must make, then the work is allocated in a
random but balanced fashion. The system tries to assure that each of
the examples is allocated to the students the same number of times.
The allocation is random in that if, say, ten examples are submitted then
it is highly unlikely that the first student is allocated submissions
1, 2 and 3 to assess.</p>
<p>If the teacher submits a fewer number of examples than given
in the corresponding parameter of the assignment, the students
are given just those examples to assess.</p>
<p>After the teacher has submitted the examples it is important for the
teacher to assess these examples. The assessments by the teacher are used
in the corresponding parameter of the assignment, the students
are given just those examples to assess.</p>
<p>After the teacher has submitted the examples it is important for the
teacher to assess these examples. The assessments by the teacher are used
internally when the students assess these examples. The closer the teacher
and the student are the higher the &quot;grading grade&quot; awarded to the
student. The assessments made by the teacher are private to the teacher,
they are NOT show to the students at any stage during the assignment. The
grades awarded to the students for these assessments are, however,
displayed to the students. Once graded, the students are given an
oportunity to re-assess the example if they to get a better grading grade.
student. The assessments made by the teacher are private to the teacher,
they are NOT show to the students at any stage during the assignment. The
grades awarded to the students for these assessments are, however,
displayed to the students. Once graded, the students are given an
opportunity to re-assess the example if they to get a better grading grade.
</p>
<p>The examples and their assessments can be viewed and revised from the
<p>The examples and their assessments can be viewed and revised from the
Administration page of the workshop.
</p>
+10 -10
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
<p align="center"><b>Weight of Teacher's Assessments</b></p>
<p>This option, usually set at 1, can be used to either &quot;switch off&quot;
any assessments made by the teacher, to give them an equal weight as the
student assessments, or give them more weight than the student assessemnts.</p>
<p>This option, usually set at 1, can be used to either &quot;switch off&quot;
any assessments made by the teacher, to give them an equal weight as the
student assessments, or give them more weight than the student assessments.</p>
<p>The normal value for this option is 1. This gives the teacher's assessments
the same weight as student assessments.</p>
<p>There may arise circumstances when it is felt that the students are consistently
&quot;over grading&quot; assessments, that is giving their peers too high a
grade. The oposite may happen when the peer grading is too low (but that is
more unusual). The poor grading by the students can be compensated, to a
grade. The opposite may happen when the peer grading is too low (but that is
more unusual). The poor grading by the students can be compensated, to a
degree, by increasing the value of this option. Setting the value to 5, for
example, means that if there are 5 student assessments of each submission,
say, then the teacher's assessment has the same weight (in dropping suspect
assessments and in determining the grade)
example, means that if there are 5 student assessments of each submission,
say, then the teacher's assessment has the same weight (in dropping suspect
assessments and in determining the grade)
as all 5 of the student assessments. Further in the analysis of assessments,
student assessments which do not agree with that of the teacher are more
likely to be dropped when this option is greater than one. The remaining
student assessments which do not agree with that of the teacher are more
likely to be dropped when this option is greater than one. The remaining
assessments are closer to the teacher's grade thus giving even more weight
to the teacher's assessment.</p>
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
<p align="center"><b>UnGraded Assessments (Student Submissions)</b></p>
<p><b>Assessment of Student Submissions</b> These are the peer assessments
made by students on eachother's work. In general, these assessments do NOT
have to be graded by the teacher. Provided each of the student submissions is
assessed about five times, the system can make a reasonable judgement on
the inidivual assessment performance of the students. When the number of
peer assessments is low then the teacher may want to grade these
assessments. Any grades given to the assessments can be taken into account
when calculating the final grades for the students.</p>
made by students on each other's work. In general, these assessments do NOT
have to be graded by the teacher. Provided each of the student submissions is
assessed about five times, the system can make a reasonable judgement on
the individual assessment performance of the students. When the number of
peer assessments is low then the teacher may want to grade these
assessments. Any grades given to the assessments can be taken into account
when calculating the final grades for the students.</p>