27 lines
1.6 KiB
HTML
27 lines
1.6 KiB
HTML
<h1>The Over Allocation Level</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>This level determines whether the allocation of peer assessments to the class
|
|
is balanced or not. Here the term "balanced" applies to the number
|
|
of times each student submission is allocated for (peer) assessment. When the
|
|
Over Allocation Level is set to ZERO, all the submissions are allocated the same
|
|
number of times, that is, the allocation is balanced. When the Level is set to ONE
|
|
then some of the submissions may be allocated once more than other allocations
|
|
(and it follows from this that some of the submissions may be allocated once
|
|
less than other allocations), that is the allocation is unbalanced. Similarly if the
|
|
Level is set to TWO then a greater unbalance is allowed.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Ideally all peer assessments should be balanced. However, the disadvantage
|
|
is that some students will not have their full quota of submissions to assess
|
|
until AFTER the last student has submitted their work. When the Over Allocation
|
|
Level is set to ONE, then most students will find that they have their full
|
|
"quota" of submissions to assess and they do <b>not</b> have to
|
|
wait for late submissions. Waiting for late submissions should be even rarer
|
|
when the level is set to TWO.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>So in a Workshop assignment where the number of peer assessments is
|
|
set to 5, and there is no concerns that some of the submissions will be (peer)
|
|
assessed 4 times, some 5 times and others 6 times, then the assignment
|
|
will "flow" smoother and the students will not have to wait so
|
|
long (if at all) for others to submit work if the Over Allocation Level is
|
|
changed from its default value of ZERO and set to ONE.</p>
|