The icon itself has been found insufficient, teachers did not realize it
was used to switch the phase. Its semantics is even less intuitive in
Boost when we do not show it on course outline any more.
So this patch starts to display the information that has been present
for assistive technologies only. As a side effect, I spotted there was a
bug that caused the id attribute "mod_workshop-userplancurrenttasks"
was used for all titles (not only the current one) so it did not
really serve the purpose well.
Change userplan HTML structure from table to unordered definition list
<dl> <dt> and <dd>. Add accessibility string for task-todo, task-done,
task-fail, task-info to be read by screen reader
This patch adds a new report to be displayed during the submission
phase. The report displays all participants who are supposed to submit
their work into the workshop and the status of their submission.
In order to use the overall feedback in assessments of example
submissions and in the assessment form preview, significant improvements
in the rendering machinery were done.
Workshop class provides two new methods overall_feedback_content_options()
and overall_feedback_attachment_options() as they are needed at various
scripts and libraries.
Overall feedback is displayed as a part of the workshop_assessment_form
only if the form is in editable mode (not frozen). If the form is
displayed in read-only (frozen) mode, the caller is expected to render
the overall feedback and list of attachments (the editor and filemanager
elements do not support frozen mode). To do so, the renderable
workshop_assessment now loads overall feedback data and provides two new
methods get_overall_feedback_content() and
get_overall_feedback_attachments() to be used by the renderer.
Renderable workshop_submission, workshop_assessment and related classes
now accept the workshop instance as the first parameter in their
constructors. This way, these renderable classes have access to the
workshop API.
In the future, the rendering of submission files should be improved in
the same way as is done in this patch (i.e. moving the logic and data
preparation out of the renderer into the renderable classes).
Teachers can now choose the actual grading evaluation method to use
during the grading evaluation phase. The workshopeval_best is still used
as the default one (this may be made configurable later, although there
is no big benefit of it).
The method user_picture::fields() was not available when these SQL
statements were originally written. Now instead of hard-coding the list
of returned fields, the user_picture is asked for the list.
Together with this change, methods workshop::get_submission_by_id()
and workshop::get_submission_by_author() now return the information
about the user who provided the feedback and overwrote the grade.
While working on the new capability to view authors of published
submissions, I realized that published submissions are correctly listed
(implemented in 00bc77ee) but they can't be viewed by submission.php.
This patch fixes submission.php so that it allows to view published
submissions.
Also, I noticed that when the workshop is closed, the submissions that
were assessed by the user are not listed (as they were in the previous
phases) but submission.php provides access to them correctly. So I added
a code that lists assessed submissions in the closed phase.
Important change: teacher's assessments of example submissions (now
known as "reference assessments") are now displayed to students after
they assess example submission.
David Mudrák